>>4577368 lb

>> Q and masonic civil war

Precisely.

I don't think it is all purely Masons.

I think it goes back to "who is God?" And "who/what is 'the devil.'"

The current model used for "God" within Christianity, Judaism, and Islam is, effectively a cult of Elohim - a deity of tyranny, to make a long story short.

This makes the story of "devil" or "adversary" more nuanced. It also puts "The Light Bearer" - Lucifer - in a different context.

Most people are good. You put them in front of a situation and you ask them to evaluate actions based on good/evil, most are good.

But how do we define good/evil?

Prometheus was a Titan who was known as a trickster... Arguably an adversary of just about anyone who thought they had the world by the ass, as he often put them up to tricks to expose their flaws. Depending on who you were and what stories you believe - most of these were rather harmless... Or could get rather brutal. Anyway - he especially loved to fuck with Zeus and to give humans the better end of most deals.

Somewhere along the way, the original context of many symbols has been lost, and our own understanding of things has been replaced with a narrative constructed by the orders of Pharisee. The Babylonians, effectively.

This has led to a number of people getting confused - or being able to be confused. By using the eden story we are all familiar with and the idea that evil is the devil is lucifer, it became possible to implant the idea that "evil is enlightenment."

In short - you can convince people that doing evil things creates a sort of competitive drive which spurs evolution of ideas. "Rape people until they figure out how to stand up for themselves"... In a twisted form of logic where "evil" is "necessary" to "teach."

Thus "bringing light" becomes "teaching lessons."

Chances are, masons who have "sworn allegiance to Lucifer" are of orders who believe this.

If you understand what Prometheus was about, then you understand that swearing allegiance to him or to serve him is getting on the fucking short bus. You don't want to be on the short bus of "enlightenment."

The masons (and other secret orders) who hold to the older traditions of operating against the order of Babylonian tyrant worshippers have been squabbling for some time, and the British Crown has held a huge advantage for some time, it would seem (or apparently so).

Though who is who in the blood lines is a bit if a mystery. I think the Babylonian order looks to male lineages while the masonic orders look at female lineages, and thus we have a bit more nuanced of a war than meets the eye.

>>4577524

There is no "highest classification."

Each agency has its own standards of classification standard. Military classification standards are different than Department of Energy. TS and Q are roughly equivalent in terms of their "rank" - but wildly different in context and content.

Military TS:SCI is going to be things like emergency destruction procedures for a SCIF, operational contingencies, the circuit boards of cryptographic equipment, etc. The cryotography equipment may be a fucking raspberry pi and a soldered-on FPGA cooked up by Petty Officer COTS at Devgru, but no one needs the schematics to find a vulnerability. As far as everyone is concerned, it's a black box that runs based on magic runes and smoke. Don't let the magic smoke out of the box or fuck with the runes on the outside and it will be good.

Q-clearance is an entirely different beast. If there is a secret nuclear reactor built somewhere… Q. If there's a secret transport system. Q. If there's a restricted access program developing some new energy technology… Q. Of course, compartmentalization means that you must have a need to know - but I would think the President has a need to know what his authority is being used to keep secret… No?

>>4577600

Several possibilities - most I can think of use lunar-orbiting relays. Place a constellation of three or four satellites orbiting the moon at overlapping periods that are in line of sight of each other - and boom. They can be extremely small these days - not much bigger than a cell phone or tablet would suffice, plus enough maneuvering thrusters/fuel to get them into proper orbit from a host carrier.

You could also use a single orbiter and just use automation to supplement. Receive data, input a string of commands to execute, send once it gets to the other side and pick up new info from the rover.