>>4582910 (pb notable)

>Todays fun facts:

>

>3 people died on the same day

this gets some points for effort perhaps. and this anon does find it interesting that it was these 3 that died (any anon that knows lewis' abolition of man and huxley's brave new world could figure out just how fucking symbolic it was that just these 3 died….)

i find the alice in wonderland connection to clive staples lewis tenuous at best….unless the idea is that lucy visiting narnia via a wardrobe is the same as alice going through the looking glass.

not seeing that that works for whatever it is you might be wanting to say.

lewis carroll is the guy your looking for. he didn't make it to 1962. but he did write through the looking glass as well as some papers on logic that were published by Mind somewhere back end of the 19th century.

>>4584842

>We lost faith after NOTHING happened.

lots of shit happening. maybe you should hang out with the biblefags for a bit or something. they can be irritating, but at least they have a bit of fucking patience. what's it been 2 years? biblefags be waiting 2 fucking millenia for habbenings and theyre still all juiced up and ready for a fight.

fuck is wrong with you?

>>4584900

>Yes, but it was POTUS.

>

>Not Q.

>

>They arent the same thing.

and you know this how? and attach relevance to it why?

Q as far as i can tell doesn't do shit outside of post here.

and yeah, i get it, POTUS is doing lots of stuff. lots of stuff other than post here.

and the evening star is visible in the evening sky and not in the morning sky and vice versa for the morning star….ruminating on this particluar little example of naming, meaning, and reference gone awry might help you to understand what is wrong with your line of reasoning. then again it might not.