Saw that too. Read more.
Richardson Amendment.
http:// mprofaca.cro.net/ciapress3.html
or?
https:// fas.org/irp/congress/1996_cr/h960522q.htm
(c) Voluntary Cooperation.–Subsection (a) shall not be construed to prohibit the voluntary cooperation of any person who is aware that the cooperation is being provided to an element of the United States Intelligence Community.
To ""Protect"" journos?
Keep the secret….
GUYS LOOK
The have to 'GO TO THE PRESIDENT' to do certain things
I think Obama HAD TO HAVE APPROVED certain spy operations
The only way they could 'do it' was it he approved it
Then they re-wrap and 'hide' it from the President?
Why do I feel like there are two opposite things about to wash together?
OSGOOD
OSWALD?
"""PRESIDENTIAL FINDING"""
https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_finding
https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_finding
https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_finding
https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_finding
Guys I think I'm onto something here too
ALLOW PRESIDENT TO ACT BEFORE NOTICE
IRAN deal
CONGRESS NOT NOTIFIED
The most recent change to exercise of findings occurred in the Intelligence Authorization Act of 1991, which introduced increased flexibility in the reporting requirement: findings are to be "reported to the intelligence committees as soon as possible" after being approved "and before the initiation of the covert action authorized by the finding." As such, presidential findings are one of the primary means through which the intelligence committees exercise their oversight of the government's intelligence operations. However, the Intelligence Authorization Act allows the President to proceed without notifying Congress if he notifies them afterwards "in a timely fashion."[1][2]
CLERGY LOOPHOLE???????