>>4590474 (LB)
Right on, anon. Right on.
Not sure it's really relevant to the post I replied to, but no, the Senate can't do anything on its own w.r.t. funding anything.
It's a movie. The Italian with a strangely Russian accent… Whoever wrote this screenplay must have been watching Soap in the 70s.
I still haven't figured out the angle with her, however.
No way he didn't know. His role has yet to be fully revealed. There's a reason they made a big deal out of him and he pushed this obviously fake relationship so hard on twatter. Then their uber-friendship with Tom Arnold…
What does RR have to do with it? He's no longer responsible.
One of the guys I follow seems to think so. I don't. I have a fair understanding of AI, enough to know its limitations. It works really well in very constrained circumstances, but we're still years, maybe decades off from something that can pass a Turing test (which is what it would take to be true AI).
He is not what he seems.
With the Trump Campaign portion (the only unredacted authorization in the memo), yeah. He's working on the other stuff RR added with the classified memo he issued… coincidentally immediately after McCabe was removed. Or not coincidentally. :)
No, it's conjecture, i.e., your opinion. It's not a fact until it happens. Learn the difference and people that understand won't call you a retard. Like I'm doing right now.
I can't imagine that would hold up to Constitutional muster.
The image on the right ignores the fact that the same Senate that had convicted Trump would then get to vote on him being appointed VP. I'm pretty sure they make these memes to make us look stupid. It's probably a good idea to stop pushing that one.
I am well aware of that.
They can, but this seems to ride a different angle, sort of a state treaty designed to get around the Constitution. Don't get me wrong, I don't know, and wouldn't be surprised either way the SC would rule if it made it there.