Anonymous ID: 5dbbc4 Jan. 3, 2019, 11:16 p.m. No.4591016   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1044

Notice what is happening? They are stressing the importance of Masonry to the fuckery.

 

Later they will nuance it and show how the Masons are fucking infiltrated along time ago and most masons have devolved into real faggotry and Jew shit.

 

But not all. Very important to remember that point.

 

Watch "Lodge 49" and "Brainstorm" to see where the shit went wrong. Were we lost the narrative.

Anonymous ID: 5dbbc4 Jan. 3, 2019, 11:27 p.m. No.4591099   🗄️.is 🔗kun

You faggots starting to realize we are watching a scripted event? How long has donald been time traveling?

 

There can be only one!

Anonymous ID: 5dbbc4 Jan. 3, 2019, 11:49 p.m. No.4591249   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Kurgan hypothesis

Main article: Kurgan hypothesis

The Kurgan hypothesis postulates that the Proto-Indo-Europeans were the bearers of the Kurgan culture of the Black Sea and the Caucasus and west of the Urals. The hypothesis was introduced by Marija Gimbutas in 1956, combining kurgan archaeology with linguistics to locate the origins of the Proto-Indo-European (PIE)-speaking peoples. She tentatively named the culture "Kurgan" after their distinctive burial mounds and traced its diffusion into Europe. This hypothesis has had a significant impact on Indo-European studies.[note 1]

 

Those scholars who follow Gimbutas identify a "Kurgan culture" as reflecting an early Indo-European ethnicity, which existed in the steppes and southeastern Europe from the 5th to 3rd millennia BC. In Kurgan cultures, most of the burials were in kurgans, either clan kurgans or individual ones. Most prominent leaders were buried in individual kurgans, now called "Royal kurgans." More elaborate than clan kurgans and containing grave goods, the elite examples have attracted the greatest attention and publicity.