>>4593247 (lb)
>https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/secretary-of-defense-jim-webb/
>Webb would be a master move
Agree
>>4593339
>Webb needs to be looked into very carefully.
As does everyone. Don't recall those stories, though do vaguely recall him being gaslit by the establishment whenever he veered from the uniparty line.
>(the R incumbent never showed up for a debate)
The incumbent was Joe Crowley, not an R. Her district is >85% Dem so an R winning there would be a miracle.
>Would there be a better way to implode the D Party than to have them light their own fuse?
Maybe they already have?
There's definitely a ton of leverage from her past to apply, that's for sure.