There isn’t enough data to draw any conclusions about Mitt, Bain or the LDS Church being bad guys regarding Trump, or Mexico, or the CF or whatever.
So I’ll assume good or neutral until I see much more, if that ever occurs.
What we do have though is Mitt’s peculiar behavior, which in many ways now mirrors No Name’s as an inexplicable adversary in all things.
So I’ll leave it at neutral for all, but with the curious caveat that Mitt at least acts like he’s up to some kind of mischief.
Huber of course could have been a 100% decoy instead of the 50% decoy we were just told this week.
smh.
If Mitt turns out to be a bad guy, I think I have the frame of the most likely scenario wired up here.
But he could also just be weird and bitter about losing the election and being mercilessly mocked by President Trump, who may have already forgotten his name. Because for all Mitt’s noise, he really has no power or influence.
Bain and the LDS could just be high finance investors.
Time will tell.