Anonymous ID: 236f96 Jan. 4, 2019, 7:25 p.m. No.4603000   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3028 >>3126

>>4602946

Pretty solid, but a question if you please.

>3b) the filter-using anons oblige, and filter the UIDs.

You are suggesting that those who filter an ID, will also filter responses to that ID which they cannot see because it's filtered?

This is something that I personally have not done and have not observed. I am wondering if some anons really do start blasting away at everyone who replies to a known shill. Not sure that makes sense, because our cadre of anons know that every once in a while, one of us responds to a shill just to make it clear to newbs that we recognize the shill tactics. So if we were to filter everyone who replies to a known shill, we would likely be filtering out some of our frens.

 

Thanks for your analysis.

Anonymous ID: 236f96 Jan. 4, 2019, 7:30 p.m. No.4603058   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3118 >>3313

>>4602958

I don't know how much credence to give to this story. It was first seen on Sorcha Faal, a known disinformation source that sometimes mixes in very interesting speculations/rumors/lies/truths. Then it appeared in a different form on Before Its News, also a rumor type site that is not credible. Then a youtuber picked it up and ran with it.

 

So I have it mentally flagged as something that is possibly true, a scenario that at least partly fits the "facts" we have seen, but unsauced. ("Facts" are also hard to nail down sometimesโ€ฆ)

Anonymous ID: 236f96 Jan. 4, 2019, 7:36 p.m. No.4603142   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3238

>>4603118

>and that's not enough for you to pass, anon? sounds like AJ syndrome to me

 

You no speakee Englishi?

Pass is when you emit flatulence.

Or hand a note to another person.

Or drive in the passing lane to get ahead of another car.

Pass?

Anonymous ID: 236f96 Jan. 4, 2019, 8:01 p.m. No.4603396   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3417 >>3430

>>4603313

Do you recall the incident where we believed that a Marine MEW stormed CIA HQ at Langley, it was around 3rd week of Nov 2017 IIRC. We had an image of 2 Ospreys flying low over a metro area, photographed by someone in a car.

Never found out if that really happened or not either, but it could have.

Anonymous ID: 236f96 Jan. 4, 2019, 8:03 p.m. No.4603425   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3433

>>4603313

And there was also that incident of a car crashing the security barrier on the way OUT from, I believe it was also CIA HQ? We had a ton of pictures. Appeared that someone was trying to remove a haul of documents and got stopped.

Anybody have those pictures handy?

Anonymous ID: 236f96 Jan. 4, 2019, 8:18 p.m. No.4603574   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3685

>>4603497

Interesting speculation.

 

But dates?

On August 5, 1981, President Ronald Reagan begins firing 11,359 air-traffic controllers striking in violation of his order for them to return to work.

The attempted assassination of United States President Ronald Reagan occurred on March 30, 1981, 69 days into his presidency.

 

The assassination attempt couldn't have been payback for firing the ATC because it preceded it.

But your speculation about ATC being a national security and possibly crime risk, it very interesting nonetheless.