>www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-conspiracy-theory-that-wont-end-enough-is-enough/ar-BBJqXgJ?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=ientp
Article gives her plausible deniability and a sympathetic ear. Going after the kid's is a suckers bet and will only come around to grab the poster in the ass. Researching this from the adults who could be tied to agency's would have been the smart bet. If there was agency exposure through Big Pharma or a 3 letter agency and calling out a documented connection, seems the better approach.
Actors, students are just the tool. Just as bad to focus on as the those that focus on the gun being the problem.
The research is on, who or what fires the gun, not the gun itself, not the students themselves, if you want to reveal what the core problem is here. To do that, it's best to find out what set this situation in motion at the onset.
My understand the real story behind these false flags was the agency's setting them up. By focusing on students, crisis acting, people buried the real story and it didn't come out.
Guess those who wanted to make this whole shooting about victimizing students as crisis actors accomplished their goal.
I certainly see her point: The madness started within months after the photo was taken, MacDonald said. She didn't know anyone who died in the Boston bombings but attended a vigil a day after the April, 15, 2013 attack.
She got emotional after seeing a young boy place a flower down during the vigil and started crying. An Associated Press photographer captured the moment and it ended up in newspapers across the country, making her a target of conspiracy theorists.
"I feel like I was very vulnerable in that image. I was sobbing uncontrollably and every time I see it, I'm right back there and relieve those moments," MacDonald said. "I just feel awful for the victims and families of the other women because they lost loved ones and still have to deal with this madness. It's just exploiting a tragedy."