His presidency is the reason people finally figured out that Keynesian economic theory was bunk, which ultimately got Friedman the economic Nobel. Sadly, we forgot those lessons.
No. If you don't believe me, take apart your computer/monitor/whatever. Look for a CCD sensor (look it up on Wikipedia). If one doesn't exist, then they can't watch you (other than through your obvious camera lens). Besides that, it doesn't work that way… imaging requires lenses, which are easy to spot.
If you care as little as you seem to claim, why exactly are you bothering to get in here and tell us about it? Asking for a fren…
The amount of storage it takes to record text messages is staggering, to record calls is 100x, and to record images would be several orders of magnitude higher than that.
We simply don't have the processing power to deal with all of that anyway. If you've been paying attention to the way all the spygate stuff went down, you'd also know that they had to go into the database and request certain information (702 queries). That's because it is not automated, otherwise, it would have been a live-stream from every source, no database searches necessary. We simply aren't there yet and anyone claiming we are has even less of a technological understanding than you do.
I'm a sat-comm engineer. You seriously do not know what you are talking about. You also don't understand optics. They can't photograph a dime, they can barely resolve a letter on a license plate.
Literally everything you said is nonsense.
The lurk, stop dividing.
Lol, if you believe that you should find new sources of information. I already gave you the evidence (702 queries). You have been misled.
I write software for satellite communication receivers. I'm an expert in signal detection and classification. I've been doing this for over 20 years, including radar, cellular communications, and various other signal processing systems. If you pay attention to what I've been posting it should be obviously true that I'm neither lying, nor incorrect.
Basic optics. It's the same reason the Hubble doesn't take good pictures of the moon, or just about any other near-field object. The current resolution limit is several centimeters. This is physics. Maybe you should spend some time studying how optics work rather than telling everybody how deep your ignorance actually flows.
That's not an optical image, and GPS has nothing to do with an image anyway. GPS is the signal that tells you where you are. Duh.
Damn, you people are stupid as fuck.
I don't doubt that you don't believe me. However, nothing you have stated is fact. Pressed, you could never prove it, either. You lack the requisite technical knowledge to do so on your own as well. Somebody else told you we could do these things and you, brilliantly, without the ability to validate their claims, believed them.
The whole point of Q is to get people like you to stop doing that.
You mean imaging technology? Which one? There are several involved, the most important being the optics themselves.
You do understand the logical fallacy of saying "it has advanced in one area this much, therefore it has advanced in an unrelated area an equal amount which allows me to prove my point that some arbitrary point of my definition qualifies to prove my point" right?
I am well aware of how much it has advanced. GPS has been quite accurate for decades. The new system they just started launching (GPS-IIIA) will be even better. But that's a pure tech upgrade. Imaging requires OPTICAL improvements, which necessarily includes the SIZE of the mirror in the camera. It has to be bigger to get better resolution. Anybody that has ever owned a telescope knows this.
And a higher level of stupid, apparently.
What does that have to do with satellite imaging?
If you're going to claim you aren't stupid, don't respond to something I never claimed as proof I'm wrong about something I did claim. Doing so pretty much implies that you are incapable of following an argument, which means you are stupid.
>photographing a dime on the ground is aerial observation territory, not satellite
And relatively low altitude aerial observation as well.
The other problem is our atmosphere. Light does not travel through it as it does free-space. They account for that in rather interesting ways with the various telescopes looking up.
Controlled opposition, maybe. With the new nitwits in her ranks she's got a civil war on her hands, too. They'll spend the next 2 years proving they are incapable of running the country (if not outright criminal). Maybe that was her deal… dunno.
Gotcha, I quick-read it as mirror aberrations, which is true as well. My bad.