>>4603643 (lb)

>If there was ANY dirt on Trump it would be out already.

I think this is true. "she never thought she would lose" 'means a hell of a lot more than people appear to understand the complete gravity of.

"she never thought she would lose" == if there truly were anything real on trump, it would have come out long before november 2016, nevermind any october surprise, or anything else for that matter, as we go into current events.

It's why [they] chip at the people around him.

https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/?q=now%20they%20all%20lose.

>>4603841

No. They come and go in shifts.

Plus the other thing to remember is that posting UIDS and posts per minute (now @ 12 ppm) is not indicative of overall site traffic from the internet; it's only a gauge on the amount of visitors actually posting.

>>4603902

I dunno where your 5 is coming from but I see 102 posting uids right now

>>4603974

I doubt it. Those were 3rd party actors imo

>>4604006

>https://www.dailycaller.com/2019/01/04/obama-house-wall

"The Daily Caller asked the Secret Service agent if we could walk to the Obama house on the sidewalk. The officer told us he would be forced to stop us if we tried."

would be forced

I don't think it's house arrest, I think it's the SS codifying that he's following edicts that he's only duty bound to comply with.

>>4604079

I think the USSS assigned to the Obamas hate their assignment.

>>4604083

They couldn't even get to the house. I think Trump is correct. I remember a story in the wayback (late 2016 early 2017) about obamas new digs and how they were building walls.

If I find sauce Ill post it

>>4604144

he lived in DC because initially [they] thought they would be able to monitor the President better than [they] turned out being able to, and O's job was to sabotage DJT's progress.

In many respects, Obama is a failed operator.

>>4604326

It's entirely likely that that is just an informed anon.

Because the truth of the matter is, I've seen enough to know they are right, and I'm not NSA.