Anonymous ID: 9dc150 Jan. 4, 2019, 8:38 p.m. No.4603788   🗄️.is 🔗kun

pb….

>>4600910 >>4600997 >>4601144 (all PB) Daily Caller could not even enter the street Obama lives on

 

Ivanka and Jared just have a metal fence

 

sauce:

https://www.businessinsider.com/photos-washington-dc-kalorama-neighborhood-tour-kushner-trump-obamas-2017-11#i-headed-to-tracy-place-to-see-whether-jared-kushner-and-ivanka-trumps-block-was-blocked-off-it-wasnt-but-there-was-mental-fencing-around-their-house–37

Anonymous ID: 9dc150 Jan. 4, 2019, 8:47 p.m. No.4603899   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4603802

>>4603852

>With the new Muslim members of congress and how the Courts and the lefties love to appease the Muslims how long before it is America, Have you noticed anything strange about our country lately

Local governments already steal kids from the mothers when they reach age 14 (sharia law)

Anonymous ID: 9dc150 Jan. 4, 2019, 9:06 p.m. No.4604131   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4165 >>4318 >>4428

Life of a whistleblower case

sauce:

2012 memo from US Attorney Eastern District PA

 

The qui tam complaint must, by

law, be filed under seal, which means that all records relating to the case must be kept on a

secret docket by the Clerk of the Court. Copies of the complaint are given only to the United

States Department of Justice, including the local United States Attorney, and to the assigned

judge of the District Court. The Court may, usually upon motion by the United States Attorney,

make the complaint available to other persons.

 

The complaint, and all other filings in the case, remain under seal for a period of at least

sixty days. At the conclusion of the sixty days, the Department of Justice must, if it wants the

case to remain under seal, file a motion with the District judge showing “good cause” why the

case should remain under seal. '''In the usual course, these motions request an extension of the

seal for six months at a time.'''

 

>Interesting that Mueller asked for a 6 month extension

 

In addition to the complaint filed with the District Court, the relator through his or her

counsel must serve upon the Department of Justice a “disclosure statement” containing

substantially all the evidence in the possession of the relator about the allegations set forth in

the complaint. This disclosure statement is not filed in any court, and is not available to the

named defendant.

 

Under the False Claims Act, the Attorney General (or a Department of Justice attorney)

must investigate the allegations of violations of the False Claims Act. The investigation

usually involves one or more law enforcement agencies (such as the Office of Inspector

General of the victim agency, the Postal Inspection Service, or the FBI.)

 

>Hrm…Office of Inspector General>>>>Horowitz

 

The investigation will often involve specific investigative techniques, including

subpoenas for documents or electronic records, witness interviews, compelled oral testimony

from one or more individuals or organizations, and consultations with experts. If there is a

parallel criminal investigation, search warrants and other criminal investigation tools may be

used to obtain evidence as well.

 

There are no statistics reported on the length of time the average qui tam case remains

under seal. In this District, most intervened or settled cases are under seal for at least two years

(with, of course, periodic reports to the supervising judge concerning the progress of the case,

and the justification of the need for additional time).

 

Next post…what happens upon intervention

 

sauce:

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-edpa/legacy/2012/06/13/InternetWhistleblower%20update.pdf

Anonymous ID: 9dc150 Jan. 4, 2019, 9:10 p.m. No.4604165   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4318 >>4428

>>4604131

<Cont'd post 2 of 2

Life of a whistleblower case

 

sauce:

2012 memo from US Attorney Eastern District PA

 

Intervention by the Department of Justice in a qui tam case is not undertaken lightly.

 

Intervention usually requires approval by the Department in Washington. As part of the decision

process, the views of the investigative agency are solicited and considered, and a detailed

memorandum discussing the relevant facts and law is prepared. This memorandum usually

includes a discussion of efforts to advise the named defendant of the nature of the potential

claims against it, any response provided by the defendant, and settlement efforts undertaken prior to intervention. This memorandum is considered to be attorney work product exempt from

disclosure.

 

Upon intervention approval, the Department of Justice files

 

1) a notice of intervention, setting forth the specific claims as to which the United

States is intervening;

 

All other documents filed by the Department of Justice up to that

point remain under seal.

 

>Explains some of the 70,000+ sealed court docs?

 

The decision by the Department of Justice to intervene in a case does not necessarily

mean that it will endorse, adopt or agree with every factual allegation or legal conclusion in the

relator’s complaint. It has been the usual practice of the Department to file its own complaint

about 60 days after the intervention, setting forth its own statement of the facts that show the

knowing submission of false claims, and the specific relief it seeks. In addition, the Department

of Justice has the ability to, and often will, assert claims arising under other statutes (such as the

Truth in Negotiation Act or the Public Contracts Anti-Kickback Act) or the common law, which

the relators do not have the legal right to assert in their complaint, since only the False Claims

Act has a qui tam provision.

 

Each named defendant has the duty to file an answer to the complaint or a motion within 20 days

after service of the government’s complaints. Discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure begins shortly thereafter.

 

sauce:

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-edpa/legacy/2012/06/13/InternetWhistleblower%20update.pdf

Anonymous ID: 9dc150 Jan. 4, 2019, 9:19 p.m. No.4604248   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4603974

>possible that wizards and warlocks might use a "hacker group" front to drop some of what they have?

I've thought the same and thought even they might be doing it because it is passed the statute of limitations