Anonymous ID: deb632 Jan. 4, 2019, 11:11 p.m. No.4605350   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5421

>>4605280

>but My trust in your predictions

 

Nobody makes predictions here unless they are doing it wrong.

 

Q is not "predictions"; Q provides raw information, to be discerned for validity by researchers interested in that.

 

There's two groups that go for the "predictions" shit, and you belong to one of them:

 

1) newfags

2) shills.

 

Pick one.

.

Anonymous ID: deb632 Jan. 5, 2019, 12:10 a.m. No.4605866   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4605843

MY personal rule is: If it's posted more than a handful of times across a few breads, it's crap if anons have reviewed it and rejected it.

 

..And the poster is either being paid, or they're overly obsessive, which is a sociopathic trait.

Anonymous ID: deb632 Jan. 5, 2019, 12:20 a.m. No.4605942   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4605886

 

the actual problem is, you mix a little bit of truth with some whole grain bullmeatshit.

 

And then do circular arguments with anyone you do interact with.

 

Because you suck.

 

You just hate /BO/ because he spanks your ip history.