because it's already leading to a false assertion. 1- "if" implies a lack of confidence… it also opens the realms for new Q followers/DT supporters to think that it is a possibility that Q/DT could be bad.. planting weak statements in nonbelievers is dangerous. they can than be manipulated by spooks on yt & used to fuel the DS anarchy cults.
I am not worried about the shillz but I know the power of persuasion that can lead a person seeking for truth down the wrong path. we need to stay vigilant with the minds on here.
What we say on here matters, how we say it is very Important. Words matter, words are powerful and can build or destroy a movement. be subjective with ur words if u want to influence ppl.
-
use examples everyone can relate to. Such as the rounding up of pedophiles, the removal of ppl out of powerful positions followed by why its relevant is more meaningful that a 1 off statement based on belief rather than facts. Just because one person believes doesnt mean it will rub off on another. the tactical battle field for winning the mind of a brain for a nonbeliever requires solid support with evidence on why it is relevant to the cause at hand … why did X get moved from office? who was he/she affiliated with? always tie a news article back to a DS plan & that will solidify the hearts and minds of new fags that Q/DT are good guys.
just using "Q said.." isnt going to influence anyone except ppl who already believe in Q. Q is a resource not a mandate, not a messiah, not a doctrine. Using the evidence (articles relating to take down of DS) to support the resource is far more superior then quoting the source. [most of us r doing this already]
Let the news Speak (since that's what the sheep see), make the connections with the source (Q - future proves past) & then tie it back to the DS.. (killary, bummer, Rothchilds..etc)