>>4610048

>https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/01/rereading-cletas-email.php

>>4609173 pb-n-Q

>https://twitter.com/brithume/status/1080929050120593410

>On-the-record denials this sweeping and emphatic apparently caused some journalists not to write this story. The McClatchy guys went with it anyway, despite their sources’ refusal to be specific about what, exactly, was being investigated.

McClatchy has been pumping out some seriously sketchy articles.

Their current chairman is scion Kevin McClatchy.

Odd that his wiki page has the frat he joined but not the college he attended?

>>4610886

So if Snowden can arguably be considered a traitor, what does this story make McClatchy?

Who are they working for really?

https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/30/us/qaeda-plot-leak-has-undermined-us-intelligence.html