LAWFAG JUST GETTING started on posse comitatus act

18 U.S. Code § 1385 - Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatus

Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

The act does NOT includes the United States Navy and the United States Marine Corps, however the Navy and Army have prescribed regulations that are generally construed to give the act force with respect to those services as well - IN OTHER WORDS WATCH THE PEN ANONS - THESE CAN BE MODIFIED ANYTIME BY POTUS

AND OH BTW Looky what was REPEALED in DECEMBER 2016

10 US Code Section 332 states: "Whenever the President considers the unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the United States, makes it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any state or territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into federal service such of the militia of any state, and use such of the armed forces to suppress the rebellion." On its face this is a very low threshold, only elevated by political considerations.

https://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/parameters/articles/97autumn/lujan.htm

Major exception to CP Act - POOF GONE!

repeal by Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, § 1241(c)(3), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2500.https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/332

>>4613077

do they? prove it

they just work there

lawfag moar on PCA

KEY anons is this part of the law: "….except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress."

there are MANY legal arguments for POTIS power under the Cosntitution in time of war and national ER - But he doesnt need that since Congress passed the Insurrection Act of 1807 and it was amended by Congress in 2006 EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZING the following:

1) The President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to–

(A) restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that–

(i) domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; and

(ii) such violence results in a condition described in paragraph (2); or

(B) suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such insurrection, violation, combination, or conspiracy results in a condition described in paragraph (2).

(2) A condition described in this paragraph is a condition that–

(A) so hinders the execution of the laws of a State or possession, as applicable, and of the United States within that State or possession, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State or possession are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(B) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

To proclaim a state of insurrection is a necessary prerequisite if cascading powers, such as is found in 50 U.S.C. § 212 Confiscation of property employed to aid insurrection, are to be used. ((KEKS AUDIBLY))

PATRIOTS IN CONTROL

Sauce - 10 USC, Chapter 13, §§ 251-255)

>>4613416

LAWFAG HERE

OFFICIALLY DECLARING THE DARK OVERLOAD A SLIDE

ill just keep reposting the reasons and opinion i came to first time i read the complaint and related docs: HERE:

lawfag here - reposting below - still have seen nothing to change my analysis - hope we will but i doubt it - scope of this is not what we want - just seeking public moneys it appears although the groups involved certainly dont like these docs out i doubt they will pay any shekels

sorry anons but these are nothing burgers with regard to ANY issue of disclosure or who really knowcked down the tower

they do not even RAISE THE ISSUE

the ONLY issues here are claims of lack pf preparation and readiness for a possible attack (ie NEGLIGENCE not conspiracy)

this is all about which imsurer companies pay for what share of the claims

NONE are attempting to lay blame at anyones feet for the attack itself - only "they shouldhave seen it coming" and so the shoudl bear the loss - if successful this will shift liability to guess who? from the insurance companies to

YOU AND ME - PUBLIC ENTITIES AND THEIR MISMANAGEMENT THE WE THE PEOPLE PAID THEM FOR AND NOW HAVE TO PAY FOR THEIR BAD JOB

more DS CRAP