I'm not doxing myself.
But I know more about it than you do.
They paid off a lot of people, so what?
The people who didn't take the money had unusual "accidents" or had, for instance, a Bush lawyer get involved with their relatives, have their family turn against them and take their inheritance.
There were not many hold-outs. It 's a longer story.
Remember POTUS' friend's wife?
She would not take the money
Remember the plane flight?
suspicious crash connected to a phone call by Hillary Clinton
Remember Rodham Clinton has the patent on a devise to bring an airplane down remotely?
Right after meeting with Obama and discussing her evidences?.
What happened then?
That's the meta-data.
You have to look at data in a context.
I would be much more interested to know what was Beverly Eckert's evidences - that she presented to Obama, than to put credence onto files which could be forged and are of unknown provenance.
[from my experience on this beat.
The problem is what people ignore, not what they are unable to read from allegedly "official" documents]
The evidence is right in front of people, but they don't have the conviction of their 5 senses plus logic of their own minds.
They are waiting for it to be announced on CNN.
I know that sounds laughable, but that is really it.
It won't be real 'til CNN announces it and they can tell all their friends "I told you so."
Better to use Logic than to rely upon likely fubarred "documents"
He who smelt it, dealt it.
Beverly Eckert
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/archive/NATLSept-11-Widow-Among-Plane-Crash-Victims.html
9/11 might even be a slide for what we are involved in here with "Q" and President Donald J. Trump.
Beverly Eckert is not, though.
There was a "Q" drop about her.
>>4608574 pb
I love this theory. It's great.
Would make for an amazing movie