>>4615257 (lb)
>muh protests!!!1
>>protest who, exactly?
>muh corporations!!!1
The only way to protest against a corporation that actually works, is by protesting with your wallet.
They will give zero fucks about a vest of any color. The only thing they will listen to is the lack of money flowing into their coffers.
Saw a report about the first tribunal case set for late january.. Confirms for me things are already in motion. God bless you all!
>why can't the President expose the voting fraud
They already answered this:
The president will not be addressing that. The justice department will.
1) It is a state issue, not a federal one
2) since it is a state voting issue with federal implications, it will be handled by the DoJ.
That's why you should neck yourself.
New England. They're the reason why the USA happened in the first place.
Coincidentally, New England is only second to Ca for it's systemic corruption.
Go figure ;p
>She is NOT in the state congress / house she is in the FEDERAL house
<demonstrates ZERO knowledge of the idea that the US congress is filled with STATE senators and STATE reps.
Where exactly do you think US congress people come from, rabbi?