Anonymous ID: 11818e Jan. 5, 2019, 6:53 p.m. No.4620082   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>4619541

 

Who is (((they))) who the political establishment has been beholden to?

 

(((they))) who don't have our good in mind..?

 

Have we been at war a lot longer against (((they))) in space? Are Obama, HRC, Comey consider lawful or unlawful combatants? Have they been detained by our military force this whole time as lawful combatants?

 

"Because Lawful combatants are subject to capture and detention as prisoners of war by opposing military forces. Unlawful combatants are likewise subject to capture and detention, but in addition they are subject to trial and punishment by military tribunals for acts which render their belligerency unlawful."

 

Was Roosevelt a good or bad guy?

 

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”-

 

Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942),[1] is a case of the United States Supreme Court during World War II that upheld the jurisdiction of a United States military tribunal over the trial of eight German saboteurs in the United States. Quirin has been cited as a precedent for the trial by military commission of any unlawful combatant against the United States.

 

It was argued July 29 and July 30, 1942, and decided July 31, 1942, with an extended opinion filed October 29, 1942.

 

This decision states in part that:

 

… the law of war draws a distinction between the armed forces and the peaceful populations of belligerent nations and also between those who are lawful and unlawful combatants. Lawful combatants are subject to capture and detention as prisoners of war by opposing military forces. Unlawful combatants are likewise subject to capture and detention, but in addition they are subject to trial and punishment by military tribunals for acts which render their belligerency unlawful. The spy who secretly and without uniform passes the military lines of a belligerent in time of war, seeking to gather military information and communicate it to the enemy, or an enemy combatant who without uniform comes secretly through the lines for the purpose of waging war by destruction of life or property, are familiar examples of belligerents who are generally deemed not to be entitled to the status of prisoners of war, but to be offenders against the law of war subject to trial and punishment by military tribunals.

 

 

I have been obsessed with this case forever.. Read the books and all. It is interesting wiki names the eight as Germans when 2 were naturalized citizens and one was at the age of 10.

Anonymous ID: 11818e Jan. 5, 2019, 7:08 p.m. No.4620331   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>4620049

"For those that control the levers of power in Washington and for the Global Special Interests"

 

That is about it in a nutshell.. The above includes the Rothschilds, Soros, Vatican, etc

 

So I ask again… who are (((these people))) the above partner with who don't have our good in mind?