Anonymous ID: 5c2c19 Jan. 6, 2019, 9:08 a.m. No.4627320   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7391 >>7503 >>7517

>>4626795

LAWFAG HERE

OFFICIALLY DECLARING THE DARK OVERLOAD A SLIDE

ill just keep reposting the reasons and opinion i came to first time i read the complaint and related docs: HERE:

 

lawfag here - reposting below - still have seen nothing to change my analysis - hope we will but i doubt it - scope of this is not what we want - just seeking public moneys it appears although the groups involved certainly dont like these docs out i doubt they will pay any shekels

 

sorry anons but these are nothing burgers with regard to ANY issue of disclosure or who really knowcked down the tower

 

they do not even RAISE THE ISSUE

 

the ONLY issues here are claims of lack pf preparation and readiness for a possible attack (ie NEGLIGENCE not conspiracy)

 

this is all about which imsurer companies pay for what share of the claims

 

NONE are attempting to lay blame at anyones feet for the attack itself - only "they shouldhave seen it coming" and so the shoudl bear the loss - if successful this will shift liability to guess who? from the insurance companies to

 

YOU AND ME - PUBLIC ENTITIES AND THEIR MISMANAGEMENT THE WE THE PEOPLE PAID THEM FOR AND NOW HAVE TO PAY FOR THEIR BAD JOB

 

more DS CRAP

Anonymous ID: 5c2c19 Jan. 6, 2019, 9:11 a.m. No.4627340   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4626852

>they've admitted

wtf are they?

more sliding

READ the lawfag post

it gives the reason why the restr of the docs will not vary from the initial dumps

Anonymous ID: 5c2c19 Jan. 6, 2019, 9:13 a.m. No.4627366   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7414 >>7426 >>7446

>>4626852

lawfag here

have any of you faggots ever reviewed a litigation file?

well i have - hundreds of times - and it sucks

some guys can build a house quick

i can review a giant stack of papers

i wont say the 2 words you need to hear cuz its meaningless (but true)

Anonymous ID: 5c2c19 Jan. 6, 2019, 9:29 a.m. No.4627523   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7540

>>4627426

>>4627414

not sure what more you anons want

basic fact is ths initial PLEADING - the complaint in a case determines the entire scope of the proceeding - what facts are relevanet and material and what are not

In this case that complaint makes it very clear the issue is NEGLIGENCE

that means the state/city/fed govt/port of NY failed to prepare for a "foreseeable event" and should therefore PAY ALL THE DAMAGES (INSURED CLAIMS) THESE COMPANIES PAID OUT

and guess what is worse? the DEFENDANTS did NOT raise third party fault as a defense - they already caved and will just fight negligence on their part and how much tax money they will pay out

THIS IS THE RIGGED SYSTEM ON DISPLAY

no judge is going to allow evidence of the 9-11 conspiracy with this framework