>>4629105

Rather, Q gave us a heads-up with accurate knowledge of what would happen ONE WHOLE YEAR in advance. He didn't have to. If you assume that one-year-in-advance predictions are supposed to happen on the date when they are given, that's YOUR problem, not Q's. There were tons of indications that the clock needed to be "wound" to correspond to the actual timeline. Q said it multiple times but you didn't understand.

Filtration

>>4629213 There should be a legal age of consent and this should be the prerogative of the state. Consider the differences of these ages. In NV for example 16 is the age of consent. Other states use 17. Is this inconsistency unfair? Just think….someone could legally be with a 16 year old in NV and then step a few feet over the border into CA and be with a 17 year old and go to prison. This is a conundrum.

>>4629553