Anonymous ID: 89a814 Jan. 6, 2019, 6:02 p.m. No.4636345   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6361 >>6375 >>6410 >>6436 >>6445

So… if @Snowden was C_A sent to sabotage No Such Agency, wouldn't logic dictate that the false narrative Pedowood tried to establish with the 2016 Snowden movie would imply that Oliver Stone is a C_A asset/agent? Possibly similar with Stone in 1991?

Anonymous ID: 89a814 Jan. 6, 2019, 6:21 p.m. No.4636688   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6732 >>6737

Okay, Oliver Stone and his co-writer Kieran Fitzgerald based their work off a book so they may have been duped (just giving them the benefit of the doubt) and may not be C_A assets. Kieran runs a production company with only a Fakebook page. One book they used was by a UK jounalist Luke Harding (probably compromised). The other book was a work of fiction based upon interviews with @Snowdan by a Russian lawyer. So in part what they based the movie on is known to be fiction, but what parts?

 

My god, anons. When you look into the web of journalists WW that were involved in this, they can't be all in the dark. And my biggest conclusion: @Snowden's attempt wasn't just the C_A trying to harm No Such Agency, the C_A wasn't alone. With coordination of journalists in Europe that suggests The UK's MI5/6 agencies were probably involved to.

 

Was the @Snowden scenario an inside FVEY attack on No Such Agency?