>>4852686
congratulations! I see you keep breaking new projection records!
still kvetching I see, it is much more comfortable to talk about a spelling mistake than to actually bring arguments and tackle the reply.
<muh evil jews rape 3 year old girls
fake and gay. The talmud doesn't permit or promote any of this shit or anything at all, it presents and discusses religious law.
>The Talmud Does Not Permit Sex With A Three Year Old
http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/three.html
all written here:
http://talmud.faithweb.com/
as always, you keep on kvetching and bringing the same garbage that originated in thefake and gay book "talmud unmasked".
>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861โ1917).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked
The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.
He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:
>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.
>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]
>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216
KEK!
>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.
KEK!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis
carry on with the kvetching!
attached shill garbage is relevant.