>>4643019
If I incorrectly assumed your intentions, I apologize. Shit happens.
Don't disagree with the effects of nicotine in "bringing people down" from a psychoactive episode, nor do I disagree with tobacco in its heirloom form having far far less naturally-occurring scopolamine than say datura. But tobacco is a complex plant (not just nicotine) and burning it makes it even more so. And, sorry to say, but it's foolish to think that cigarette companies have not been successfully breeding plants for generations to enhance certain chemical characteristics and then add chemicals in the processing to further enhance certain psychological & physical effects in targeted groups of individuals. Think KOOLs for example. They've got that shit down to a science.
Now are they doing this so that once one of their cigarettes is burnt, scopolamine is formed inside the body while the nicotine negates the obvious impairment effects? Impossible for either of us to either prove or disprove without a grant to do a full study. Will say that cigarettes do have both stimulant and depressant characteristics depending on the individual, so I still don't see how the above can not be possible given that scopolamine is a naturally occuring alkaloid in the nightshade family and a multitude of chemicals are added during the processing of tobacco into cigarettes, including bromine derivatives.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02218144