Bitching about notables is a trap anyway.
Why do I say that?
Because notables are directly analogous to news headlines. Which leads to a question anons should be asking themselves, before they spend any more than a post or two complaining about a notable:
Do you take news headlines at face value, too?
This place is for research. The original intent of notable posts was for anons to keep pace with the flow of the breads, not as a consensus chart of any kind. Sauced facts are preferred, but shit happens if the baker's inexperienced or comped..
Nothing can be edited or deleted by anons and the NSA reads it all, so the power of notables has been put on a leash, to an extent.