>>4636450 (pb Notable)

 

Decoding Haberman Tweet

 

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1081974511598211072

 

"There is no smoking on the train.

The Law is clear

If your found smoking

Discovered, breaking the Law

We'll assume your on fire

Fires can spread quickly

and take the appropriate action,"

Extinguish your fire.

says the Amtrak conductor.

A - Your Handler

 

After Q's reply I followed up on the continued discussion, though no one recognized it as having value. This morning I reviewed the information combined. In the above tweet, A is Maggie's 'Handler'. In Q's response, Q picks up the discussion by beginning with A.

The 'stone' identifyer may be key in understanding who Maggie's 'handler' is. 'Stone' could be referencing the first letter only, making the initials AS. Maggie is stating she is under the threat of death in her tweet. In Q's reply, Maggie is being offered a deal with 'protection'.

 

Q Reply to Maggie Haberman: Decode Part 2

 

>>4636767 (pb Q Post)

 

https://twitter.com/maggienyt/status/1009982937952079873?lang=en

https://twitter.com/maggienyt/status/1065100343846031362?lang=en

 

A stone sits idle

A(S) remains unchanging

while the world around it evolves.

The world is changing.

Evolution, depending on the stage, can be deadly.

EvOlution

EO's, in certain situations, can be deadly.

 

An implied threat to the 'handler' A.

 

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1081974511598211072

 

We can talk through code

We can discuss entering an arrangement

or we can act through transparency.

or we can act in clarity.

The choice is yours. However, the clock is ticking, and, at a select point in time, that option will be expired.

The offer of an arrangement is time limited.

Regular service

Normal, Something you do for someone else to make them happy

appointments should be made

meet someone soon

in order to maintain functionality.

in order to keep on living.

Q

 

I posted Part 2 last night, which I've reviewed and restructured some of the analysis with regard to the discussion in total. I'm unsure of how the first 2 tweets referenced by Q are relevant, though they must be or Q would not have included them. If y'all have any thoughts on that, I will review and update this info. Once we unlock all of the details it can put it into a graphic.

 

Take the Deal Maggie