>>4647453 (lb)
Anon has a way to potentially confirm that theory.
DJT has decided in the past that he's a big fan of imminent domain. It's probably my only complaint about him.
That's a pretty significant point you made there, anon.
Who's complaining? It's my only beef with him, from a Long Island (I think) ruling several years ago.
No one is perfect. I'm happy with the POTUS I've got, thank you very much.
Pffft. Piss on someone else's parade. It was eminent domain ruling for economic development.
The value of my property might well exceed fair market value to me.
However, in the case of national security, I'd take the dive. For the false argument of economic development? Bite me.
From 2015.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/08/19/donald-trumps-abuse-of-eminent-domain/
And I reiterate that it is possible to disagree with POTUS and remain a patriot.
Last time I'll respond. You are sliding.
The shills are cranky today.