>>4647365 (lb)

There were times it seemed the period counts have been intentional (this is an old graphic, has some outdated guesses/methodology on it but the period count bit still seems interesting to me)

However, DJT tends to do this with ellipsis in tweets all the time, so it could just be meaningless.

>>4647680

Thank you for restating the prevailing and obvious opinion based on publicly available facts using unverifiable credentials.

>>4647799

There, that's better

>>4647948

It's been in breads and notables all morning Anon.