>>4649049 lb

>Hillary Clinton Joins Andrew Cuomo in Push for Extreme Late-Term Abortion Bill in New York…

<<“Our right to make the most deeply personal decision is facing the most significant threats in recent memory,” she said. “This administration has rolled back access to reproductive health services at home and around the world and proposed cuts to international health development and diplomacy that put both women’s lives and our National Security at risk.”…

Okay, so restricting abortion affects our National Security?

Because why? There would seem to be no connection between abortion rights and so-called "National Security!!!"

What new insanity is THIS???

>>4649079 lb

Are we supposed to assume that the demons worshipped by the Cabal require blood and body parts from children, so they can continue to keep their possessed "puppets" like RBG and Pelosi alive?

Wait- What?

I Hillary is going to make these extreme statements, in public, shouldn't we take to social media & the streets to demand answers?

Why does abortion affect "National Security?"

Wait for it… Some moran will say we are shipping all the baby blood to Khazarian vampires in Tel Aviv.

Because white American Democrats couldn't possibly worship demonic entities, so it has to be a fake, mythological bad guy of some other origin?

>>4650688

You have a good point, completely unrelated to my post. General Anesthesia has no relation to "National Security" either.

Why is Abortion related to "National Security?"

>>4650708

Once again, My question is, "How is Late-term abortion related to National Security?"

According to Hillary, it is.

Your comment on the development of a baby in the womb, in relation to abortion rights has literally nothing to do with the post you are replying to.

>>4650797

Your comment has nothing whatsoever to do with the post to which you are replying.

What does late-term abortion have to do with National Security?

According to Hillary, it does.

>>4649049 pb

>>4650552

>>4650850

Why is Hillary claiming that late-term abortion has implications for our "National Security."

I think EVERYBODY missed the entire point of my post.

>>4650552

…Which was a reference to this post >>4649049 (pb)

I'm starting to think nobody on day shift can actually read.

Now, you all are discussing everything BUT the actual quest:

Why or How does late term abortion have anything to to with OUR NATIONAL SECURITY???

>>4650981

Holy smokes!

The ebot is the only one who read my post so far!

Computer-generated gibberish is better than the responses thus far!

>>4650958

Thanks for commenting on the actual post, rather than going on anon about a different subject.

Okay, so- should we assume that Hillary is just drunkenly throwing out bywords like "national security," because she ran out of intelligent comments during a discussion of late-term abortion?

Or, is there actually some link between harvesting viable babies and national security?

>>4650981

>>4650552

Seriously, the ebot actually used computer-generated AI gibberish to concoct a better reply to my post than anybody else on day shift could come up with in their little noggins! Nobody else bothered to answer the Question:

Why does harvesting late-term, (viable babies) have any relation to our National Security?

>>4651160

But, doesn't the Bible, (Old and New Testament) support the idea of a stationary, flat plain, surrounded by an ice wall, and protected by a tempered glass firmament?

Wasn't most of it written by the Hebrew people?

>>4651233

You make an excellent point about night shift being the best shift.

Your comment about ebot is crude, and dismisses my point, which was that one could decipher a plausible answer to my question from what ebot replied.