The internet is controlled to such an extent that all Q discussion is segregated into a narrow pen of a couple boards and scattered single threads. The vast majority of "right wing internet" completely prohibits Q discussion. And it's not just controlled mods, but "people" on every forum that will vociferously attack Q. Organic?

If all that internet is controlled to that extent, what else is not organic?

Where does and "NPC meme" come from? Can anything organically go viral anymore?

How would we know?

The "NPC meme" was accompanied by an unrealistic frenzy of activity– organic?

Squeeze the humans out– "boiled frogs"– how would people ever know it happened?

FAKE internet.

If the ENTIRE "RIGHT WING INTERNET" is controlled to such an extent that all discussion of Q is effectively prohibited, then what else is similarly controlled?

If the power to shut down Q discussion exists, then isn't that same power pretty much able to dictate any narrative it wants?

Yet how do we take the massive FAKENESS this implies into account?

Not just media, but INTERNET is FAKE.

>>4652920

It is possible to prohibit Q discussion almost from the entire internet.

And meanwhile, on one of the very few spaces Q is allowed, we are unable to prohibit an anti-POTUS bot from posting relentlessly.

What is wrong with this picture?

Is the internet free?

Or is it completely under the thumb of FAKENESS?

Strategies:

DIVIDE: "Right wing" internet FROM "Trump supporters"

DIVIDE: "Trump supporters" FROM "Q followers"

DIVIDE: "Q followers" FROM "other conspiracy theorists"

DIVIDE: Q followers by an and all identity criteria– by platform (chans vs. ___), by generation "boomers", by "kike" talk, ETC.

>>4653049

You will find very strict rules implicitly followed all over the internet, keeping these various divisions in place as much as possible. The_Donald is all about POTUS, but prohibits Q talk. This board is all about Q and presumably about POTUS, but anti-POTUS attacks allowed under guise of "free speech".

"Conspiracy forums" may have only one thread on Q (GLP appeared to be this way last I checked), or else may attack and prohibit Q entirely.

And of course the first line of defense is to separate a "right wing" identity from "Trump supporters", in which case Q never even gets in the door, naturally.

The internet is CONTROLLED.

Why isn't this overwhelming fact discussed?

>>4653164

It's hilarious that bots keep arbitrarily smearing gray paint on people's faces and thinking that makes a meme.

lol, you're a huge joke, bots

>>4653246

What are you SELLING, bot?

>>4653272

No, it's bad. It's not funny. There is no joke there. You idiot bots have no idea what funny is, and you keep pushing it. It's insane, but you can't understand that. lol!

>>4653333

And yeah, then you have the little bots that all say this crap over and over. Very stiff, wooden, badly written dialogue. "The cabal hates the NPC meme, kek!"

I mean, it's a fucking joke, these bots. And yet they predominate by sheer numbers.

The internet is controllec by brute-force saturation, often of material that is absurd, incomprehensible or insane in various ways.

The "mutt meme" was an even more insane example.

lol!

Very bizarre, fake internet we have.

The memes are the best, because AI is worst at them.

>>4653457

Because you are restricted to weak, timid one-liner responses, I can always talk circles around you, bot system. Thereby always demonstrating my humanness in contrast to your FAKENESS. Sucks to be you, bot system.

Now flail more.

>>4653532

You're an obvious bot, and the system of bots as a whole is too clumsy to stop posting this obviously, flamingly fake material that was directly translated from 4chan /pol/ with no alteration. This shit is s a joke, bot system, yet you persist.

Keep flailing. Flail harder.