>>4644347 (old)

Here's my take on the bump stocks ban. If we're going to have machine guns, have proper ones. Heck I don't really mind if you modify the firing mechanism to put in select fire, as long as it's close to being like OEM full auto. Don't make them even more dangerous, with weird behavior like tending to spray up and to the side unless corrected dynamically.

Since we ban machine guns (unless you have the proper permit, then go ahead and own them) we shouldn't allow the inferior, more dangerous cheezy version with bump stocks.

>>4653048

But then Trump could just do his speech a couple days later. Am I missing something?

>>4653054

I wish him a full recovery and increased strength for AfD.

>>4653201

Terrible. I don't know the technicalities that may have caused SCOTUS to say the case should go forward. Maybe it's important to allow state investigations under such circumstances.

But if an oil company can't even fight back against the received climate "science" propaganda, then who will be able to.