>>4652891

lawfag here

the volume complexity and absurdity of the federal law is so enourmous there is no lawfag or anyone else that can answer this question in good faith

yes there are many authorities granted to POTUS

there are also many restrictions

there are also many DS judges

i am certain POTUS had an array of specialists and lawyers look and every aspect as best as possible before deciding - this alone is a very large task

so we will have to wait and see

>>4652904

very skered

must be able to "contextualize" = spin and lie

>>4653065

anyone watch this?

did they include the stand down order

or anything else 9-11?

>>4653153

yeah i agree

but POTUS is his own man

and he likes deals

if it comes to it POTUS will drop the hammer

>>4653264

>10 U.S. Code § 2808

NOTABLE baker

lawfag here

this is what POTUS will rely on - solid

nice digs HELPER anon

i couldnt find it

>>4653372

i would gladly postpone the POTUS address for that news

aint gonna habben

they will hold that until 2020 if they can

>>4653393

lawfag here

yeah its big but with so many fucking fed employees (inc military not just DOJ) its easily doable