>>4653681

I don't understand the Qlock, but I regard efforts in that direction as Qanonical.

>>4653695

Yeah, you're definitely a top-list expert on the matter. /sarc

>>4653963

This is why Q called people who go off the deep end "suspectable" (Q#832). They're already borderline, so who who would think twice if MKU tech pushed them over the edge?