>>4657714

for the several hundredth and last time.

the time on the watch is 03:14:40

if you want to not include the seconds DON'T round up

3:14:40 = 3:14 or 15:14 , never 3:15

>>4657826

says the watch

says the history of timestampfagging

>>4657902

>Which has predicted exactly what?

it not about predicting, it's about future proves past

>>4657931

why did you respond twice to the same post? pretending to be two different anons?

>>4657962

yes clearly too much to handle, like reading a watch

>>4657963

i understand how ID's work, thought that anon might not have

>>4658000

trips checked , and ignorance excused.

the top smaller dial and the large second hand are irrelevant for telling the time on that watch.

the small top dial and the large second hand are the stopwatch mode on that watch. therefore , hour hand and minute hand = normal , small bottom dial = seconds