Anonymous ID: 4ef87b Jan. 7, 2019, 11:20 p.m. No.4658488   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8573

>>4658262

>>4658405

Well if this reply timestamp (and 143 post # delta = 1, 4x3=112) doesn't verify the death supposition based upon the 12/21 post, I don't know what will. Prior reply was fancy too (to a numberfag, anyway).

 

RBG B on ICE… fo sho.

Anonymous ID: 4ef87b Jan. 7, 2019, 11:32 p.m. No.4658612   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4658573

Thanks anon. I try to keep up on ALL the Notables from when I wasn't here, but it's not entirely real-world feasible. Figured stuff like that had been addressed.

Anonymous ID: 4ef87b Jan. 7, 2019, 11:45 p.m. No.4658729   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4658303

>>4658546

Lionel was pretty much at the start for me too, anon. Same conclusions about him you make. Thanks, rarely watch now. Very start came from all the twitter hashtags… I was like, WTF is this hashtag that everyone whose opinions I like seems to have? Gradual acclimation from there. Had NEVER been on 4ch/8ch… DIDN'T KNOW THEY EXISTED. Kek… talk about completely-ignorant layman + lurking learning curve + dozens of notable (you)'s later = present day.

Anonymous ID: 4ef87b Jan. 7, 2019, 11:49 p.m. No.4658763   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8872

>>4658623

Nice digits. For anyone who cares, that ubiquitous snapshot is (unfortunately or by design) from some oddball timezone (AUS?).

18/6p:14:55 EST on 6/23/18 is accurate. Play with Q-drop and POTUS tweet deltas from THAT time and date.

10-4?

Anonymous ID: 4ef87b Jan. 8, 2019, 12:06 a.m. No.4658914   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4658840

1:00:30 later (111)

578 posts later (5x7=35-JFK, 7+8=15-three fives… other permutations too)

 

The timestamp of the post saying she's dead is well before Q's watch post, and has all of the elements OF the watch post. 15-hour serves as the 3 and the 15 in 3:15. 59+ is where the largest skinny hand is (typically second hand, but maybe not on this watch) and the :05 equals the watch's date window. The 40 and 60 are a little more adventurous, I suppose, unless I'm missing something. POTUS #46 next up.