Anonymous ID: 20059f Jan. 8, 2019, 8:28 a.m. No.4662157   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2346 >>2383

One of these, the micro-electrocorticography (ECoG) electrode grid, is placed beneath the skull and on the surface of the brain's movement-controlling motor cortex. A computer system interprets the electrical impulses in the brain captured by the micro-ECoG technology and then converts the signals into movement controls in virtual environments.

 

Say you did this to a person who is not paralyzed… can still control the motor cortex…. a computer interface…. why just the motor cortex…

 

what about all the other brain cortices that can be controlled?

 

if you are more prone they can use you

PTSD → has to do everything with thoughts right…

 

Flashbacks—reliving the trauma over and over, including physical symptoms like a racing heart or sweating

Bad dreams

Frightening thoughts

–→ carry out actions that are thought of but wouldn't have been carried out otherwise…. controlled by a computer

Anonymous ID: 20059f Jan. 8, 2019, 8:35 a.m. No.4662238   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Implanted intracortical electrodes as chronic neural interfaces to the

central nervous system

 

Abstract

Recent developments in neural interfaces show that it is possible to have fine control of a robotic

prosthetic by interfacing with the motor cortex of the human brain. Development of long term systems for this purpose is a challenging task with many different possibilities. Intracortical implants

have shown the most promise in providing enough signal selectivity and throughput for complex

control systems with many degrees of freedom. Intracortical systems generally fall into two categories: MEMS devices and bundle of wire systems. While both show promise, MEMS systems

have been greatly popularized due to their reproducibility. In particular, the Michigan probe and

Utah microarray are often used as a base for construction of more complex intracortical systems.

However, these systems still carry many downsides. Their long-term viability is questionable, with

mixed results. The effects of damage from implantation are still inconclusive and immune responses

remain a problem for long-term use. While there is some promising research in the use of bioactive molecules and biocompatible materials to prevent immune responses, more controlled study is

needed before intracortical systems become widespread.

 

read about this if you get a few mins

 

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ae0c/c0a112760e6feb099c11729f02e2e4d627cc.pdf