Veselnitskaya indictment
The net of this indictment seems to be that Natalia was involved in writing the very evidence she submitted to the court.
But NOWHERE does it say the evidence is wrong.
She showed that it was really Bill Browder behind the Russian treasury crimes, not Magnitsky or govt fraud.
Anyway, is this an attempt to discredit her further, or a backchannel way to get evidence admitted?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5677424-Veselnitskaya-Indictment.html
CEO-1 is Bill Browder
>She's connected to British Intelligence (Steele) and U1
I don't think that is true.
Look at who was tracking her a few days before the Trump Tower meeting.
She was a patsy.
>the communist party of America
Bill Browder is more likely CIA/MI6, who had a mission to bankrupt Russia and try to frame Yeltsin.
Putin got wise.
Magnitsky was the fall guy, and likely killed in prison by a hired gun, not Russian govt.
It's hard to know whether the CPUSA stuff was purely a false flag front to support those efforts.
I think you mean to say Adam Waldman, who has been working with all those people including Steele.
JA was talking to him under the context of a witness protection deal, though I expect he knew it was a trap, probably to find out what he knew.
The real question (to me) is the relationship between Browder and Deripaska.
They seem to have been working together on muh Russia?
But otherwise seem to be on opposite sides of the Magnitsky issue.
Frenemies?