>>4662069 (lb)

I've stated this before, I say it again:

If Trump needs 8 to get everything in the Plan done, he will be getting my vote to do it.

He's given this country more than any modern president in a first term, in half a term, with the full weight of the entire deep state against him.

Imagine what would be happening if there were no opposition..

>>4662186

Did your name buddy tell you that after you sat on his lap dongle?

>>4662192

>>4662192

>Make no mistake, there are forces at play on this board that would be the envy of many a psychoanalyst.

This is true, and you just responded to megashill.

-t. analyst.

>>4662232

>At this time–combined with the full destruction of the D Party–we will DEMAND that he remain in power and/or we ask him to hand-pick his replacement.

I don't think that would be wise. The rules are the rules: Two consecutive terms.

And Trump plays by the book.

I expect his endorsement for 2024 will be closely watched to ensure they carry the mantle properly.

>>4662283

I like the sound of this. We were supposed to be driving space cars around by now…

>>4662323

I suspect I know what it is.

And it has to do with whether the country goes back to having a legitimate, constitutional court system or not.

The 9th circuit is a symptom of this btw. AND it's got a specific jurisdiction, which is why [they] make use of it in the fashion [they] do..

(Hint: most "courts" you go in are administrative panels/tribunals/any definition other than "constitutional court of law".)

…Once that insurance policy is burned [they] lose the ability to force the color of law on the populace.