Anonymous ID: dc1576 Jan. 8, 2019, 8:55 a.m. No.4662486   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2652

>>4662323

If MSM, or Hannity, or someone with 1 million + viewers asks the Q question, and POTUS fessed up to the truth (NSA), then we got a problem, still.

  1. If everyone knew everything, then why the slow walk, and delayed justice? Lawsuits pending.

  2. If the answer to 1 is "NSA data, by itself, isnt actionable in court, then what good is it?" Lawsuits pending.

  3. If NSA data is, by itself, actionable in court, then why it take so long? Lawsuits pending.

  4. Even if everything was "paused" or "stopped" as soon as Trump was elected, Lawsuits pending because "muh punitive damages".

 

No matter how this pans out, theres probably going to be a metric shit ton of court cases hit, all at once, in an effort to widdle down the effort and momentum of patriots that have all contributed to the plan. This is why those 350+ appointments are so badly needed, and they are being so vehemently blocked, and why the Senate was all that mattered, at this point.

 

Get a bunch of conservative judges in place to help dismiss all that nonsense. So, as for "after Trump"? Well, how about a good screening of candidates based on new constitutional criteria? Q has already stated that election fraud will be exposed, and 2020+ is good to go. Perhaps we could see not only voter ID, soon, but a constitutional amendment to qualifications for elected officials? NSA vetting being one of those requirements?