>>4664309 (LB)

AGREED!

And it's always weird on here when you say Hannity sucks, the Hannity lovers start attacking you. He's a hack. His "Tick Tock" bullshit was fucking gay and the last time I ever watched him. I fucking HATE that shit. He just repeats himself over and over again but the absolute WORST thing he does, the thing that I want to punch him in the face for is how much he interrupts his guests!

I like Sara Carter A lot but that poor woman can hardly get a word in with that dumb cunt constantly talking over her.

There are very few things Q has implied that I disagree with, and Hannity is one of them. Even though he hasn't directly said "HANNITY IS A MUST WATCH!"

Q has always said NO OUTSIDE COMMS. Some people tend to ignore that fact when they talk about their crush.

Sara Carter & John S are important and I enjoy them very much. But not enough to ever watch Hannity again. Plus, they can barely get a word in when on his show anyway. So I follow them on Twitter.

Fuck Hannity.

>>4664494

Send them a box of chapstick prior to them talking tonight

>>4664533

lol. They TRY to tell their story

>>4664555

I have listened and he has NEVER, NOT ONCE aired anything we have not discussed earlier that day or week on here.

The ONLY thing I can say positive about him is that he is more for Newbs that don't read shit here. Which is fine. That's great for them.

But if you are a regular here, he says nothing new.

So all the dumb fucks who post his "TICK TOCK" messages or whatever here saying OMG HE'S GOING TO DROP SOMETHING IMPORTANT!!!1" Are either his interns or newbs that don't understand thats his shtick to get regular people to watch his bullshit.

As long as newbs are getting the correct info fine. But people that have been at this for the past few years non-stop know he's not "on the inside" with inside knowledge and isn't notable. I still say he gets half his shit from reading here anyway

>>4664658

Exactly this. Happens every fucking time.

>>4664770

regular Insiders sure, but I meant Q inside stuff. Sorry, I should have made that more clear

>>4664802

Will the White House Youtube channel be airing this as well live I wonder? I don't want to miss anything when the networks have "technical difficulties"

>>4664835

I would absolutely love that. That would be…I can't even explain how great that would be.

>>4664855

Exactly. Great analogy too. The guy your talking to is a bit dense & slow.