So, Trump will declare a national emergency. Good.
Dickhead from (pb)
Nobody is forcing you to watch anyone. But if you don't know that Sean Hannity, John Solomon and Sara Carter are Q media assets, or don't care, why the fuck are you even here?
Love it.
They're terrified of the people hearing directly from the President from the Oval Office. They know what such speeches do.
They change the narrative and unite the people.
POTUS does not tolerate incompetence or failure.
Here's the problem as I see it.
The DS, cabal, left, NWO, whatever you want to call it, has a very seductive message. "Let us take charge, and we will take care of you. You will share in all of our wealth without having to work; we will provide you with everything you need." Communism in a nutshell.
And it appeals to our dark, lazy, evil, twisted nature. Give up freedom, get stuff for free? The line forms immediately.
Now the conservative/religous/nationalist/patriotic message. Life is tough; work hard; deal with adversity; freedom ain't free. Do the best you can with what you have; look out for you and yours, and that's it. Oh, and by the way, the NWO communist devil worshipers are lying to you; if you surrender to them, they will either murder you, enslave you, torture you, rape you, or dehumanize you, and if you're lucky, in that order.
Love the Q anon!
Go fuck yourself, MOS. We see you from light years away.
Yes, yes it does.
-
Mr. Manafort’s Interactions with Konstantin Kilimnik
It is accurate that after the Special Counsel shared evidence regarding Mr. Manafort’s
meetings and communications with Konstantin Kilimnik with him, Mr. Manafort recalled that he
had – or may have had – some additional meetings or communications with Mr. Kilimnik that he
had not initially remembered. The Government concludes from this that Mr. Manafort’s initial
responses to inquiries about his meetings and interactions with Mr. Kilimnik were lies to the OSC attorneys and investigators. (See, e.g., Doc. 460 at 5 (After being shown documents, Mr. Manafort “conceded” that he discussed or may have discussed a Ukraine peace plan with Mr. Kilimnik on more than one occasion); id. at 6 (After being told that Mr. Kilimnik had traveled to Madrid on the same day that Mr. Manafort was in Madrid, Mr. Manafort “acknowledged” that he and Mr. Kilimnik met while they were both in Madrid)).
In fact, during a proffer meeting held with the Special Counsel on September 11, 2018, Mr. Manafort explained to the Government attorneys and investigators that he would have given the Ukrainian peace plan more thought, had the issue not been raised during the period he was engaged with work related to the presidential campaign. Issues and communications related to Ukrainian political events simply were not at the forefront of Mr. Manafort’s mind during the period at issue and it is not surprising at all that Mr. Manafort was unable to recall specific details prior to having his recollection refreshed. The same is true with regard to the Government’s allegation that Mr. Manafort lied about sharing polling data with Mr. Kilimnik related to the 2016 presidential campaign. (See Doc. 460 at 6).
The Government has indicated that Mr. Manafort’s statements about this payment are inconsistent with those of others, but the defense has not received any witness statements to support this contention.
…
There is no support for the proposition that Mr. Manafort intentionally lied to the Government. The first alleged misstatement identified in the Special Counsel’s submission (regarding a text exchange on May 26, 2018) related to a text message from a third-party asking permission to use Mr. Manafort’s name as an introduction in the event the third-party met the President. This does not constitute outreach by Mr. Manafort to the President. The second
example identified by the Special Counsel is hearsay purportedly offered by an undisclosed third party and the defense has not been provided with the statement (or any witness statements that form the basis for alleging intentional falsehoods).
DEFENDANT PAUL J. MANAFORT JR.’S RESPONSE TO THE SPECIAL
COUNSEL’S SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF ITS BREACH DETERMINATION
Something tells me the Manafort counsel knows this.
Starting to understand why muslim men keep their feet on their womens' necks.
Yeah, and then Sheriff Joe just had to go and find the original genuine one that Hussein's clowns used for a template. Also, wasn't there some sort of Pelosi deal where she said Hussein was eligible to become POTUS? That's a kick in the ass.
Someone did the same thing for no name, too, because he was born in Panama on a base. Shame. That was NEVER the issue. Two American citizen parents = natural born citizen.
NOTABLE
FADING AWAY
Don't know. Here's my guess.
Edward Snowden, the security contractor responsible for the worst leak in US intelligence history, could be considered for an amnesty to keep him from spilling any further secrets, a leading member of the US National Security Agency has said.
Rick Ledgett, who heads the NSA taskforce in charge of assessing the impact of Snowden's leaks, floated the idea of cutting deal with Mr Snowden that would see him return from exile in Russia where he currently remains.
Can't imagine how she lasted this long. Can't stand her. She's still a Cruz missile so far as I can see.
They redacted the defense characterizations of what the government said it had against Manafort.
Ever notice how the DS places gay dudes in talking head roles?
"Price of oil wants to break out over $50 a barrel, but hasn't yet. Maybe waiting for more purchase orders to come in."
Thanks for giving me the chance to filter 4 of your bullshit ids, MOS. Feels good man.
Any of these animals around children makes me cringe, hard.