Anonymous ID: bf6e02 March 23, 2019, 7:48 a.m. No.5845225   🗄️.is 🔗kun

We stared at each other. He was putting another magazine… we were just looking at each other."

 

McGuiness echoed other witness reports that the shooter was dressed in "SWAT gear", adding the attacker "looked prepared".

 

"I thought he was the police," he admitted.

 

McGuiness said the man shot out the back of a car's window before firing towards a motel then sped through an intersection.

 

The Christchurch resident didn't see anyone injured and speculated the encounter may have been before the mosque shootings."

 

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2019/03/face-to-face-with-a-killer-one-man-s-close-call-with-christchurch-shooter.amp.html

 

This man can be seen in the shooters video.

He is standing at the end of his driveway around the time the cars are shot at moments after the mosque attack. Because of the video we know this is after attack.

 

n2s see if license plates are visible, car jam. cctv footage from motel released.. same guy on the street when shooter first approach mosque?

 

https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/staring-attacker-he-reloaded-his-weapon-says-witness?variant=tb_v_3

 

The witness says he thinks this happened before the attacks. He mentions seeing Muslims getting into their car outside his house only 4 minutes earlier and them not seeming aggitated. He didn't see anyone injured.

 

Reports are saying between 200 and 300 people at the mosque when attack occurred.

The eyewitness has not reported seeing lots of people running and screaming like you would expect.

 

The bangladesh cricket players for example were not seen scampering for safety by witness.

 

The first reports I saw from the cricket team said they were inside the mosque, in a different hall when shooting started. They managed to sneak out and run across park to safety. Very dramatic but I can not locate that story any more. Now it is like they were not at the mosque, just close, possibly because them wearing shoes did not fit the first story…

They posted a tweet and video very fast. Not even an hour after attack.

 

Which takes me to the timeline of events been reported.

 

https://i.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/111321199/timeline-of-the-christchurch-mosque-shootings

 

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2019/03/christchurch-terror-attack-timeline-of-the-events.amp.html

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=15UrAsLzk08

 

In all 3 timelines we are not told of the arrest until 3:30 -4 o'clock.

 

The shooter was apprehended just after 2 o'clock in the story being told now.

 

That is before the reports of schools and town center were locked down. (Children in town center for climate change protest) n2s did any children go missing during lockdown.. pod

 

A bomb in a car was reported before the arrest around 3- 3:30

 

And that takes me back to the cricket team, when they are posting videos, police had "just discovered the second shooting 2:15ish" it was very high danger level, would cricket team be allowed to just walk around like that when an active shooter was suspected and they were witnesses to a crime?

 

This is an early news report of the camo man.. they say he had a gun at the time..

 

www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2019/03/christchurch-terror-attack-parent-caught-with-firearm-on-school-run-police.html

 

The pic of deceased lady on the side walk.

There are 2 different pictures. One has an ambulance in picture looking from road up driveway. The other seems to be in the driveway looking to the road. (Not taken with the same camera that shooter used so it is a little better quality)

 

Where did the lady come from?

 

And where did the lady shot and run over go?

 

They are not the same person. (Different colour socks)

 

Why was a tent not put up over the body. That is a standard practice in nz when a body is in view of public.