It will be shutdown or demonised just like any other alternative site that has been set up anon.
You can't escape the payment processors, dns registrars, web hosts, etc.
The perfect platform already exists anyway, you're on it now.
It was necessary I reckon anon. JK, BE, Gerry, etc all comped as fuck. And at least we get a bit of NZ first to stir things up.
I'll vote blue next election. Let's keep them from ever getting more than one term each until this process is complete and we can hopefully know who to trust.
Our big problem though is that we don't wholesale change our administration with a change of govt. Ever. It's the bureaucrats calling the shots on behalf of the UN.
That's what I think anyway, always prepared to listen to reasoned argument. That's why I think this bread is a good idea.
This is much more common than you might think. Usually with callers though, not on video kek
I think Winston is getting on a bit now. I think Shane is his protégé. He's done pretty well curbing his exuberance over the last few years and he is genuinely non-PC.
He's copped quite a bit of flak over the billion dollar regional development fund– particularly the wasted millions for that planting scheme, but he navigated that deftly with honest and direct answers and only had to endure one or two news cycles over it.
For a start anon, you can sauce your assertions. Do some research and put it here. Over time we can build up a coherent picture of what's going on.
I definitely don't think there's nothing we can do about it… Or in better words, while we still have a mostly functioning democracy we have to be involved in it and try to do something.
I for one don't want to sit back and wait for Q and the reformed US to solve all our problems. Help is always appreciated of course, and we can help them where we can. And we can…
This is a very relevant YouTube video by a now Q approved YouTuber (did the Q is 100% Trump Admin vid)
I'm sure anons would have watched this, but just in case, it is well worth the watch.
I've found among the people I know no support whatsoever for these tax recommendations, and some of these are the most screaming liberal TDS sufferers I've ever had to pity (lo
People are very sensitive to their purse being ransacked by the government, so this is the ideal redpilling opportunity. (or er, bluepilling? Very confusing….)
For instance, kiwisaver funds being subject to CGT brings the issue home for even the liberal millennial who thinks everyone around them is so super rich and elitist, kek.
Anon, this isn't a scientific study. We don't all have time to track down every supporting piece of evidence to back our claims. You should either imagine every post is preceeded with "in my opinion" or "in my experience" or challenge the specific claims you believe are incorrect (and provide sauce if you want to). Start a dialogue.
FWIW, this anon looks like they're speaking generally from experience, and I largely agree with their analysis. But I also don't accept what they've written as 100% accurate. If I see something spoopy in what they've said I'll go research it for myself.
I strongly suspect this CGT is a socialist move to lower everyone's earning potential to a lower level (moar sheep needing govt assistance), and in the process net the government a nice slice of income they don't have to lift a finger to produce.
Well, you might be able to argue that the efforts of the government to create a stable and productive environment help increase the value of capital but for something like property the increase seems to come mainly from scarcity or a general failure to provide the right market conditions. So we would be taxed on the result of a failure.
(pic related) is a classic example of media bias on the issue. It gives the impression overall that there is no issue with a capital gains tax on Kiwisaver earnings, but that is only for people earning under $43,000 (from memory), then a sliding reduction up to $70,000 (that's about US$47,000) after which they keep it all.
Some sauces for our grumpyanon:
https://taxworkinggroup.govt.nz
(lost link for pic related, kek)
Graphs from interest.co.nz
Danm, why didn't we learn 18 times tables at school?
Best way to deal with it anon, money talks. What we need is a list of ISPs that are not censoring sites.
I think we can add Orcon to the list that are complicit, but I'll confirm that tomorrow.
Commissioner Bush gave some updated timing today. The biggest change is 21 minutes until resolution instead of 36.
''He said within five minutes and 39 seconds of being notified the first responders were armed and on the scene and ready to respond and within 10 minutes the armed offenders squad was on the scene.
"Within 21 minutes the person that is now in custody was arrested."'' - TVNZ
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/christchurch-mosque-attacks-we-strongly-believe-stopped-him-way-further-attack-police
http://archive.is/PPET4
Ask yourself anon(s). Why would a link to a YouTube video need an "fbclid" parameter?
And what does that fbclid actually represent? Facebook?
Also consider that the link works perfectly well without it.
Careful how how you link anons, try chopping bits off the link and see if it still works, it usually does.