>>4675089 (Pb)

@CIA fag

Not sure your clearance/exposure, but let me know your thoughts on this post I made a couple weeks ago:

MILITARILY INTELLIGENCE HAS BEEN LEGALLY INVESTIGATING ON FBI’S BEHALF PART 1 of 2

Sauce. Check it before asking:

https://www.hqmc.marines.mil/Portals/146/Docs/intel%20oversight/Chapter%209%20(Excerpt).pdf

First, a few old Q drops to refresh our memories:

>>Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA

>>No approval or congressional oversight

>>Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies?

>>Why is ANTIFA allowed to operate?

>>Military Intelligence ref above is the absolute biggest inside drop this board will ever receive.

>>Now think about why Antifa plays right into the plan?

>>How can we listen in, track, and monitor American citizens [bad actors]?

>>What must we LEGALLY demonstrate in order to gain such warrants?

>>FISA?

>>Do we TRUST the FISA judges?

>>MIL INTEL?

Now, who CAN’T we trust?

• Rosenstein

• Mueller

• Corrupt/Leaky FBI

• Corrupt/Leaky DOJ

• Corrupt/Partisan Judges

Who can we trust?

• Sessions

• Huber

• Horowitz

• Wray

• Military Intelligence

So, what is everyone’s role in this movie?

Rosenstein: Other than appointing and protecting Mueller, his job was to implement any policies in DOJ that Mueller requests.

Mueller: Other than “getting POTUS & associates”, his job is to protect evidence that hurts Deep State/traitors. This is accomplished by requesting from Rosenstein that certain evidence that would hurt Deep State not be permitted to be shared with or pursued by DOJ/FBI officials (cuz it would obstruct muh investigation.)

Sessions: Empower Horowitz to do genuine investigations of corrupt DOJ officials (except as limited by Mueller’s requests). Fire any official Horowitz recommends. Let Wray do his thing. Act innocent and helpless.

Horowitz: Find solid evidence necessary to fire corrupt FBI/DOJ officials. Pass all evidence he finds of FBI/DOJ malfeasance along to Huber for eventual prosecution.

Wray: Be the legal FBI anchor for Military Intelligence investigations.

Military Intelligence: Do all of the investigative heavy lifting (massive resources/capabilities, 100% trustworthy, leakproof).

Huber: Once investigations (both Horowitz and “FBI”/Military Intel) are completed, he convenes grand juries, indicts in jurisdictions with favorable judges, and oversees prosecution of all cases that will be tried in civilian courts (tribunals will be saved for the traitors and the cases where evidence had to be collected in dubious ways).

Whitacker: Takeover oversight of Mueller investigation so that he could nullify Mueller’s/Rosenstein’s requests that certain evidence against the deep state isn’t shared/pursued by DOJ.

>>4675247

MILITARILY INTELLIGENCE HAS BEEN LEGALLY INVESTIGATING ON FBI’S BEHALF PART 2 of 2

The Story:

Our justice department/FBI is corrupt and cannot be trusted to fairly investigate/prosecute the traitors, let alone themselves.

Horowitz and Sessions have been cleaning the place up a bit, but the Mueller/Rosenstein team is really the last remaining vestige of corruption that is difficult to remove without rioting in the streets. Mueller and Rosenstein have effectively crippled the DOJ/FBI from pursuing the traitors, so FBI director Wray took a better route - using military intelligence to conduct the investigations.

Military Intelligence largely doesn’t play a role in investigating US persons, however they legally CAN collect, produce, and disseminate intelligence on a US person on US soil under the following circumstances:

1. It involves a “domestic disturbance”.

>>Why is Antifa allowed to operate?

Anyone with even a remote connection to Antifa can be scooped up in this category.

1. The intelligence relates to the activities of foreign powers, organizations, persons, or their agents. (So if the intelligence has any relation to anything foreign, Military Intelligence is clear to collect on a US person domestically).

1. In the absence of any foreign involvement, they may collect on US persons domestically only in coordination with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which has primary responsibility for intelligence collection within the United States.

In short, Military Intelligence can investigate US persons domestically as long as it involves a disturbance, involves a foreigner, or the FBI signs off on it (Trust Wray).

Easy-Peasy from a legal standpoint.

So MI has been doing all the investigative work with Wray’s blessing. Once MI was largely completed with their investigations, Sessions resigned so that Whitacker could take over Mueller’s oversight.

Upon taking over Mueller for Rosenstein, Whitacker ripped up the directives for FBI/DOJ not to pursue certain lines of evidence (Clinton Foundation, etc). Therefore, MI could feed their evidence back into the FBI, which could hand it over to Huber.

What happens next?

1. Mueller finally issues his report.

2. POTUS declas FISA to show everyone the Mueller investigation was a scam.

3. Huber begins indictments in friendly jurisdictions, using evidence gathered by MI and handed to him by FBI.

4. Military tribunals formed for cases that don’t go before civilian courts.

5. POTUS nominates persons to all the vacated positions and they get immediately confirmed by the senate (53-47).

6. The Democratic Party is destroyed irreparably.

NOW YOU KNOW THE PLAN

Let me know if you find any holes in the theory, but it is legally sound, matches Q’s drops, and explains why nobody has reported being interviewed by Huber.

>>4675319

Guilty as charged.

If we aren’t trying to understand what’s happening, though, what are we doing here?

>>4675383

Yeah, that fucks my head too!

>>4675428

Cheers.

>>4675473

That’s an exceptional compliment. I was tossing and turning at 4am, and pissing wifeanon off. Finally I just wrote it.

Thanks for the props.

>>4675666

1. He ain’t wrong.

2. He said, “if she wasn’t my daughter.”

Case closed. Move along.

>>4675700

Vitamin B1. Yeah, it does that.

>>4675764

No doubt.

>>4675866

And I responded to you weeks ago. Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in military tribunals. All evidence is admissible in tribunals, even if the 4th amendment was violated.

Research instead of shilling.

>>4675866

http://www.crf-usa.org/america-responds-to-terrorism/military-tribunals.html

Incompetent or shill faggot!!!!

http://www.crf-usa.org/america-responds-to-terrorism/military-tribunals.html