>>4676000 Yes, if they are STROKING THEIR GIRL'S TITS!!!! You FUCKING SHILL!
>>4676041 PEDOsplainers like yourself HAVE NO INPUT, asshole!
Baker, keep the NOTABLE the PEDOS are desperately trying to get you to REMOVE!
I don't think countering someone explaining away CLEARLY inappropriate behavior towards a minor on camera in public is "ridiculous" at all. Sorry you fell that way, but I will NEVER stop protecting children and calling out obviously INAPPROPRIATE behavior of so-called adults. NOT EVER.
>>4676007 Take ANATOMY, you fucking MORON. He was NOWHERE NEAR their 'stomachs'. This is the problem with you PEDOspaliners in a NUTshell: You are sliding FOR the PEDOS, you nasty fucktard!
>>4676291 No, asshole. Totally different thing considering POTUS never fondled her TITTIES like this guy did ON CAMERA: IN PUBLIC.
You are a sick fucking PEDOsplainer!
>>4676331 And you explaining away groping MINORS as normal is PEDOPHILIA to me. Project much, yourself, motherfucker?
>>4676403 I didn't get it originally added to the Notables, but I STRONGLY protest removal of it.
You are some sick fucks trying to cover up inappropriate actions on minor children.
>>4676329 I did not bring up the issue, but when people start sliding and normalizing clearly inappropriate actions involving minors, I WILL push back. Don't like it? IDK If those shills KEEP pushing, they ARE pedo sliding! Some are so concerned about 8chan "optics," and yet if they were SO concerned, they would change other behaviors that are not "optics friendly" too. SHILLS!
>>4676517 I think it should be left up to Anons to view the video for themselves and make whatever determinations they please. Lobbying for one or the other predisposed judgement call is UNCOOL, however. I push back on those trying to impose their own determinations on OTHERS.