Anonymous ID: 8d7cff Jan. 8, 2019, 10:02 p.m. No.4676063   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6110 >>6209 >>6238 >>6356 >>6506

Repost from last bread

 

>>4674778

The only way to have a different camera angle is with a different camera. In order for this to be different "angle", it has to be a different camera. Their is no other camera "angle". It's one static (still) shot with the talent reading off of a teleprompter. In order to have a different angle, you must have a different camera.

 

Now, that isn't to say you can't do a zoom and scale in post-production or during a live feed. They can scale it up and change the position any which way. That said, you can't change the orientation of the camera to come in at a different angle. The angle will always stay the same. It can only be scaled and positioned (moved left, right, up or down) differently. No chance using scale and position could you make the back of that seat appear higher. Impossible. The camera angle stays the same, it can't be different.

 

So what is it we are seeing? Likely a green screen with a static background. Very simple to pull off, especially with a static (still) shot. No tracking necessary. This is taught in intro video production classes in high schools and community colleges around the country. The local community college has two classes that deal with this. A green screen interview is basic and simple to pull off.

 

Why and how did this happen? My guess is the WH sent out the feed with just POTUS in front of a green screen and the networks filled in the background, likely with supplied template background. I don't see how else this could be done.

 

Why? Maybe to show people how easily things can be "faked". This is basic, not hard at all but this can plant the seed of doubt in people, especially shows like Black Mirror. In the first episode with the politician and the pig they went over this extensively and that was with talent that would be moving around. This was a basic static shot.

 

IMO they sent out a feed with just Trump and the green screen with a background template. All networks played along except for CNN which obviously did some scaling and positioning with the background. Why? To fall on the sword and prove how "fake" the media is.

 

Randall Stephenson and AT&T bought out Time Warner and he is a Republican. CNN is killing themselves on purpose. No choice but to self-destruct.

Anonymous ID: 8d7cff Jan. 8, 2019, 10:10 p.m. No.4676160   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6215

>>4676142

Who knows? Its less about where he was and more about where he wasn't, and he wasn't in the OO.

 

Im sure the WH has a full-fledged video studio so he very well could have been in their. It could be two rooms over.

Anonymous ID: 8d7cff Jan. 8, 2019, 10:17 p.m. No.4676237   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6315

>>4676209

The background on CNN was different. Thats it.

 

Pepe is cartoon I don't get your meaning but yes no green can be worn in front of a green screen. Thats why they the filmed The Muppets 2001 green screen shots with a blue screen because of Kermit.

Anonymous ID: 8d7cff Jan. 8, 2019, 10:26 p.m. No.4676340   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6430

>>4676315

None it looked legit from first glance. I didn't notice during the telecast.

 

Watch this. This is StarGate Studios green screen demo reel from 2009. 10 years ago. Nothing is real.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clnozSXyF4k

Anonymous ID: 8d7cff Jan. 8, 2019, 10:30 p.m. No.4676396   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6409 >>6452

>>4676356

Yeah I agree it looked great. That was not the point I was making.

 

Im saying the networks played along but CNN fell on the sword. The background was clearly different. Have to wake up the normies and CNN just proved how "fake" the media is .

Anonymous ID: 8d7cff Jan. 8, 2019, 10:44 p.m. No.4676564   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6575

>>4676511

For all I know anon that posted the side by side could have done the fuckery themselves in Photoshop just to send us down the rabbit hole. I admit I am only going off the anons post.

Anonymous ID: 8d7cff Jan. 8, 2019, 11 p.m. No.4676738   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6749

>>4676706

Yeah if it is the same angle form the same camera it would be impossible. But if it was a seperate camera altogether then it could be pulled off easily, because being a separate camera would make it a different angle.