Anonymous ID: ab2a29 Jan. 9, 2019, 1:08 a.m. No.4677727   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7748 >>7781 >>7797 >>7810 >>7814 >>7820 >>7823 >>7827 >>7829 >>7887 >>7922 >>7963 >>8112 >>8262 >>8266

(((SKY FORTRESS)))

 

WAS TONIGHT A TEST?

After studying both Trump's video and Schumer/Pelosi's video, I am 100% convinced we were witnessing a pre-recorded green screen on both videos. The fact that Trump's team tweeted a picture of all of them in the Oval Office "after" the speech seemed like an attempt to "showcase" where they really were. Why go to the trouble of tweeting all those angles of the speech from his staff?

 

In fact, Schumer alludes to the "spoofyness" at 3:55 in his video when he says Trump gave a speech with the "backdrop" of the Oval Office behind him. Backdrop? Code for green screen?

 

Remember Schumer/Pelosi are hostages right now acting a role to save their lives. Mike Huckabee tweeted they "looked like Hostages" tonight as well. Of course they are. Another clue?

 

Here are my concerns…

 

  1. Both videos already have the actors in a fixed position that never moves back or forward at all. This creates a fixed perspective relative to the backdrop. Normally you would see them walking up to the podium as opposed to anchored at the podium.

 

  1. Both videos have an odd edge corona along the hairline relative to the backdrop. Especially around Schumer's hair.

 

  1. Trump's video is delayed to start with which is virtually unheard of with a President's National Address, and it is exactly 9:11 long which would be incredibly difficult to time perfectly if recorded live.

 

  1. I believe we just witnessed the good guys running a real time test where these 2 pre-recorded videos were sequentially broadcast over a buffered feed during the initial delay, and then using some form of classified SAT tech, we forced the signal down the throats of MSM. This may have been a threat to the media globalists that we can take over their feeds anytime if they don't report the real news when SHTF.

 

  1. Trump then tweeted the words "soooo" and "Oval Office". The video started at 3:15. The watch was at 3:15. The post ID 315 had "Booom" and "BOOM". The odds of this coincidence are astronomical. And then he said "interesting experience" which is totally out of context to a boring speech. Another clue?

 

Conclusion…

 

Very odd. Likely a trial run. SKY FORTRESS engaged? Maybe we can now control the airwaves at will. Q says this is a WAR. The Q putas the @ symbol in KILL BOXES like this [@].

 

If the media is truly the enemy of the people, then a weapon that can defeat it would be like a nuclear bomb in the 40's.

 

Who knows. This is fun to watch.

Anonymous ID: ab2a29 Jan. 9, 2019, 1:16 a.m. No.4677776   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7779 >>7790 >>7801 >>7897

>>4677667

You are in a classic dopamine loop. The computer/digging creates a positive dopamine reaction that is addictive. This is one of the goals of MKUltra. The best way to unwind it isn't to go cold turkey, but instead, you will need to experience negative dopamine reactions while on the computer/digging for several weeks straight. The best way to do that is to force yourself to watch Magic Mike 2 over and over.

Anonymous ID: ab2a29 Jan. 9, 2019, 1:20 a.m. No.4677798   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7805 >>7850

>>4677760

Then how do you explain Kim Clement's prophecies that are uncanny in relation to Trump, and they are all confirmed years before he decided to run. I can't explain them without giving God credit.

Anonymous ID: ab2a29 Jan. 9, 2019, 1:33 a.m. No.4677885   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7892 >>8238

>>4677850

Plausible but unlikely. I have watched Kim Clement's videos for a long time and they are fascinating and unique. He never mentions Trump by name. It is equally plausible that Trump is evil and Hillary is good. But let's look at the Bible. Trump is pro life and pro Israel. Those two things alone make me feel he is a archetype of Cyrus (Isaiah 45). Of course, I always consider EVERY possible chess move by both sides and presume I am wrong. Kind of like the 13th Knesset Minister from WWZ that took the contrarian approach intentionally.