dChan
Anonymous ID: 050cd5 Jan. 9, 2019, 3:01 p.m. No.4685438   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5803

>>4685369 lb lb lb

 

lawfag here

i assume the liens were of record when you bought - if not they should not effect you

 

did you NOT get title insurance when you bought? if you did make the claim and they will get t hem removed

if not - i assume your seller gave you a deed? if so it has warranties to protect you from these liens

if you have a sales contraxct there are a;lso usually reps on the title too

you also could do a workaround to close

the title insurer can remove those exceptions if you persuade them to

 

EZ way is to escrow the amounts of the lien or sign a hoild harmless

 

you need a real estate lawyer to look at these and other options

forfeiting that amount is NOT an option - what are you thinking?

you would be better off filing bankrupcy to stay the foreclosure

many options

Anonymous ID: 050cd5 Jan. 9, 2019, 3:26 p.m. No.4685779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5823 >>6010 >>6019 >>6064

>>4685518

LAWFAG HERE

OFFICIALLY DECLARING THE DARK OVERLOAD A SLIDE

ill just keep reposting the reasons and opinion i came to first time i read the complaint and related docs: HERE:

 

lawfag here - reposting below - still have seen nothing to change my analysis - hope we will but i doubt it - scope of this is not what we want - just seeking public moneys it appears although the groups involved certainly dont like these docs out i doubt they will pay any shekels

 

sorry anons but these are nothing burgers with regard to ANY issue of disclosure or who really knowcked down the tower

 

they do not even RAISE THE ISSUE

 

the ONLY issues here are claims of lack pf preparation and readiness for a possible attack (ie NEGLIGENCE not conspiracy)

 

this is all about which imsurer companies pay for what share of the claims

 

NONE are attempting to lay blame at anyones feet for the attack itself - only "they shouldhave seen it coming" and so the shoudl bear the loss - if successful this will shift liability to guess who? from the insurance companies to

 

YOU AND ME - PUBLIC ENTITIES AND THEIR MISMANAGEMENT THE WE THE PEOPLE PAID THEM FOR AND NOW HAVE TO PAY FOR THEIR BAD JOB

 

more DS CRAP

lawfag here

 

have any of you faggots ever reviewed a litigation file?

 

well i have - hundreds of times - and it sucks

 

some guys can build a house quick

 

i can review a giant stack of papers

not sure what more you anons want

 

basic fact is ths initial PLEADING - the complaint in a case determines the entire scope of the proceeding - what facts are relevanet and material and what are not

 

In this case that complaint makes it very clear the issue is NEGLIGENCE

 

that means the state/city/fed govt/port of NY failed to prepare for a "foreseeable event" and should therefore PAY ALL THE DAMAGES (INSURED CLAIMS) THESE COMPANIES PAID OUT

 

and guess what is worse? the DEFENDANTS did NOT raise third party fault as a defense - they already caved and will just fight negligence on their part and how much tax money they will pay out

 

THIS IS THE RIGGED SYSTEM ON DISPLAY

 

no judge is going to allow evidence of the 9-11 conspiracy with this framework

Anonymous ID: 050cd5 Jan. 9, 2019, 3:42 p.m. No.4686013   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6030

>>4685924

the problem is the same male or female

VANITY

pride goeth before the fall

its nice to be fit and symettrical but if that is your self image or what you think is worthy then you are not woke

not a bit