>>4702641

>>4702117

Yes, he also emphasizes the one JudeoChristian ethic that really defines the common for-profit preacher - "All have sinned," "All are unworthy," "All are shit," "So all must come to my altar and bow down to me and give me money."

"Sin" is defined in OT terms as simply "breaking things" - such as by causing harm to others or to right things - by leaving things out, as resulting from incomplete understanding. It's not about being inevitably doomed unless a preacher says otherwise. It just means we don't know it all yet, basically, so we fail to be "complete" or to have complete understanding regarding the full ends and effect of things we do.

But in Revelation we find some "clothed in white" who are considered sin-free. These are real men, in the real world, that are no longer contributing to man's ignorant demise. And there is no law adverse to them anyone can accuse them of. They are justified because they work to right the wrongs of others. And today, many of them do that work right here on this board.

>>4706265

It's not an IQ thing.

It's a religious thing suited to their genetics.

>>4728595

Yes, this is excellent, but understanding it "in the spirit" as it applies today is a bit challenging.

Other Scripture refers to the use of fire, for instance, to purify and to try us "as silver" and "as gold." So the concept of fire, we should not fear (it also relates in the political to chaos, which we certainly now have).

But the reference to Baal is huge. This term means "master." and the use of it here relates to the fact that all our churches serve "masters" we commonly call preachers. This is in complete contradiction to the temple Jesus attended (where everybody taught, in rotation), as well as the fact Paul recognized no "leaders" or masters of any of his churches. There were particular aspects of contribution he drew attention to in certain characters, but there was no service of masters like we have today.

We have captured the "spirit" of leaderless revolution right here on this board, by having no masters, as intended, and thereby conforming more to the "ideal of church" - being a people of equity where all contribute and partake - rather than a corporation run by a board or a "master."

Here, we have Baal defeated.

>>4733738

There is a lot more to this quote than meets the eye. It actually demonstrates a few very sacred keys to unlocking a great deal of other Scripture in the Bible.

One of these concerns the use of names. Jesus has connected Marys past, present and future to him with the same name. This is consistent with the use of names in Scripture, as the names of men that lived in different times (even centuries apart), but had the same name, also seem to represent the same spirit (or the same entity) in the eyes of the Author.

(When we realize this, and come to see it in Scripture, we also realize the "Author" also sees us as eternal beings, by the same token.)

One good example of this is with the name, Saul. It's common knowledge to Bible students that there is a past time and a future time to which the house of David relates. And the story of David and his men coming to power the first time occurred in opposition to the reign of King Saul in the past - but ;ikewise, there is also another power (or metaphysically similar force) represented by the same name that we must overcome in our time as well.

In the New Testament, the name Saul again appears in the entity we all know as Paul. He was initially against the followers of The Way (much as the church is against us today). But then he became Paul and fought for it. So, in the present paradigm, the conversion of Saul to Paul would also represent a force against us that eventually becomes a force for us - again.

The actual time in Scripture when record of this name change occurs is in Acts 8, where Paul sought to speak with the Sergius of Paulus (which means, the leader of the land of Paul, basically), but was prevented by his "right hand man." Paul would then "curse" this guy with blindness and be on his way.

The land of Paul today (in spirit) is the (doctrinal) territory of common Christian leadership (past, but not future leadership). But church leaders (the help) presently have no regard for the sort of truth we all seek and espouse, and they will certainly not hear it from us, likewise. They are even blind to the fact God is with us now, and not them. But it is also the JQ mainly, that makes them blind, on our behalf, to keep them "out of our way." This will also remain the case until they wake up and see they are missing out (when they can see profit in it later on) and they will recant and seek to follow us (instead of the other way around). And at that point, the whole present day "land of Paulus" will come to dwell in the paths (ways and means of reason) we are pioneering for them in the mean time.

But also in the mean time, we are free from them interfering, and as we see how blind they really are to truth and to our goings, we acquire the freedom, inspiration and self-confidence of the name of Paul in our own ranks. And we come all the more to know God is with us now.

I should also add, this is a very real, sacred value of the JQ. - because I can assure you, if preachers could capitalize on what we are doing here, they would utterly root out every scintilla of truth they cannot sell and destroy every possible avenue of others to benefit from real truth. Their business model (of Baal) requires them to do so.

>>4735074

Yeah. Another remarkable value to that quote is how it reverses itself.

Notice it says first Mary was these … and then these were Mary.

The underlying truth here is immense. It would take years to fully elaborate on how much this means when applied to interpreting other scriptures, but it is another precious key for "applied understanding" derivable from the sacred texts.

For instance, consider the passage that says "All who call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."

But now look at the meaning of the Hebrew behind it, particularly the "call upon" part. The root term here means "to entitle." How is this reconciled? What does it mean to "entitle" the name of the Lord?

Well, consider the names that qualify. There is Truth. There is Salvation. And there are many others He claimed as His names.

So, if we find the ultimate salvation of man, as a political movement, for instance, and call it "salvation," we have "entitled" it with one of His names.

That makes this verse make better sense to the practical thinker. Those that find the real salvation or the ultimate saving truths for man, and regard them with such due respect, these are the ones that can be and are saved. How could anybody else be, unless they at least followed others that did this first - those that reversed the direction of assignment like Jesus did here, and gave due meaning to the things that matter - those that first "called upon the name."

>>4794362

They don't need us any more.

>>4790662

The ARCHETYPE of Judah (the one that took responsibility for all the brothers, tribes) is the "spiritual Jew" of end times.

This is the heir of all honor and glory and authority in the end.

And we can all see that coming right here and now. For it is we.

>>4794970

>>4794960

The state of Israel was inevitable. It was the last national inheritance granted, that of Benjamin, the last born.

All the tribes were promised to become nations. And they all did. But this last one was the only one conceived "in sorrow." Read about it.

We can all see why that is/was now. But the effect of it is to cause Jacob (the tribes) to take back the rule from Esau (Edom, who received the cursed part of the house of David for just this purpose) - such that the man of peace (mild-mannered Jacob) should ultimately become the final, national embodiment of world leadership, as it shall be heretofore.

>>4794989

Actually, no.

see >>4795137

He corrects deceitful history back to what it was to begin with.

The pic related quote is why anons are impervious to Jewish subversion.

It is because this is following the words of Jesus regarding the Pharisees -

to wit - "Whatsoever they say unto you, observe. This observe and do."

In other words, look at what they say, then look at what that looks like,

and THEN ACT according to the sum of it all.

>>4795701

Since you seem to need the whole quote. Matt 23:3 KJV:

All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.

And He wasn't talking TO the Pharisees. This was to His disciples, ABOUT the Pharisees.

How is it, by the way, you seem to keep getting confused about whether you agree with me or not? You keep arguing for my points.