Anonymous ID: 27c1e8 Jan. 10, 2019, 6:14 a.m. No.4693671   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3688 >>3700 >>3708

>>4693471

This anon shakes head. Clock is genius, just not mastered. We can't build humans… don't understand well enough to do it… doesn't reduce the genius. I use it all the time to confirm or leave unknown whether acertain event seems part of the plan/Q-influened or perpetrated. Great for deaths… deaths line up in ways that I know "Q did em"… worth it for that alone. :)

Anonymous ID: 27c1e8 Jan. 10, 2019, 6:23 a.m. No.4693734   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3777 >>3863

>>4693700

Fair enough. That applies to moar than clocks, though. People make prediction based upon their interpretation of a Q-drop ALL the time. And sincere anons read into Q-drops and QUOTE Q as saying things Q ''NEVER'' actually said ALL the time. It's a learning curve. No telegraphing of moves means that we have to be about as confused as the bad guys. We'll get there…

Anonymous ID: 27c1e8 Jan. 10, 2019, 6:35 a.m. No.4693845   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4693777

Totally agree. NOT said to be predictive… will occasionally work that way, but not reliably, so no one should be making "hard" predictions. I predicted the mail bombs 3 hours before they hit the news using the clock. SHOCKED MYSELF… but rare, and half skill, half luck. Maybe 1/8 skill and 7/8 luck.

Anonymous ID: 27c1e8 Jan. 10, 2019, 6:39 a.m. No.4693881   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4693822

Afford me the pleasantry of phrasing it differently. Kek. It sure SEEMS like their "announced" demise dates align to "Q stuff" awfully well. Barbara Bush died on "4/17"…"For Q"… "For JFK" (her pressumed involved in such, and related evils, I'd think).

 

Nice post no. BTW… 3=8=11/22 (JFK killed).